Thread (8 messages) flat view 8 messages, 4 authors, 2017-10-05

Re: [PATCH net-next v6 0/4] bpf: add two helpers to read perf event enabled/running time

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: 2017-10-05 10:36:54

On 10/05/2017 10:34 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 04:00:56PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
quoted
From: Yonghong Song <redacted>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 15:42:14 -0700
quoted
[Dave, Peter,

  Previous communcation shows that this patch may potentially have
  merge conflict with upcoming tip changes in the next merge window.

  Could you advise how this patch should proceed?

  Thanks!
]
Indeed, Peter how do you want to handle this?
I think Alexei suggested that we merge the one patch in two branches and
let git sort it out. I _think_ I've done something similar before and it
worked.
Sounds good, we did something like this in the past as well I recall,
so lets make first patch isolated to only touch perf event area so
it can go into both trees, and the remaining pieces only for BPF bits
for net-next.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help