Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 10/10] net: hns3: Add mqprio support when interacting with network stack
From: Yunsheng Lin <hidden>
Date: 2017-09-26 10:49:31
Also in:
lkml
Hi, Yuval On 2017/9/26 14:43, Yuval Mintz wrote:
quoted
When using tc qdisc to configure DCB parameter, dcb_ops->setup_tc is used to tell hclge_dcb module to do the setup.While this might be a step in the right direction, this causes an inconsistency in user experience - Some [well, most] vendors didn't allow the mqprio priority mapping to affect DCB, instead relying on the dcbnl functionality to control that configuration. A couple of options to consider: - Perhaps said logic shouldn't be contained inside the driver but rather in mqprio logic itself. I.e., rely on DCBNL functionality [if available] from within mqprio and try changing the configuration.
In net/dcb/dcbnl.c dcbnl_ieee_set already call dcbnl_ieee_notify to notify the user space configuration has changed, does this dcbnl_ieee_notify function do the job for us? I am not sure if lldpad has registered for this notifition. As you suggested below, can we add a new TC_MQPRIO_HW_OFFLOAD_ value to reflect that the configuration is needed to be changed by dcbnl_ieee_set (perhaps some other function) in dcbnl? Do you think it is feasible?
- Add a new TC_MQPRIO_HW_OFFLOAD_ value to explicitly reflect user request to allow this configuration to affect DCB.quoted
When using lldptool to configure DCB parameter, hclge_dcb module call the client_ops->setup_tc to tell network stack which queue and priority is using for specific tc.You're basically bypassing the mqprio logic. Since you're configuring the prio->queue mapping from DCB flow, you'll get an mqprio-like behavior [meaning a transmitted packet would reach a transmission queue associated with its priority] even if device wasn't grated with an mqprio qdisc. Why should your user even use mqprio? What benefit does he get from it? ...quoted
+static int hns3_nic_set_real_num_queue(struct net_device *netdev) +{ + struct hns3_nic_priv *priv = netdev_priv(netdev); + struct hnae3_handle *h = priv->ae_handle; + struct hnae3_knic_private_info *kinfo = &h->kinfo; + unsigned int queue_size = kinfo->rss_size * kinfo->num_tc; + int ret; + + ret = netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(netdev, queue_size); + if (ret) { + netdev_err(netdev, + "netif_set_real_num_tx_queues fail, ret=%d!\n", + ret); + return ret; + } + + ret = netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(netdev, queue_size);I don't think you're changing the driver behavior, but why are you setting the real number of rx queues based on the number of TCs? Do you actually open (TC x RSS) Rx queues? .