Thread (12 messages) flat view 12 messages, 3 authors, 2017-09-24

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: dsa: lan9303: Move tag setup to new lan9303_setup_tagging

From: Vivien Didelot <hidden>
Date: 2017-09-21 14:44:14
Also in: lkml

Hi Egil,

Egil Hjelmeland [off-list ref] writes:
Prepare for next patch:
Move tag setup from lan9303_separate_ports() to new function
lan9303_setup_tagging()

Signed-off-by: Egil Hjelmeland <redacted>
Minor styling issues, otherwise LGTM:

Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <redacted>
+/* forward special tagged packets from port 0 to port 1 *or* port 2 */
+static int lan9303_setup_tagging(struct lan9303 *chip)
+{
+	int ret;
+	/* enable defining the destination port via special VLAN tagging
+	 * for port 0
+	 */
+	ret = lan9303_write_switch_reg(chip, LAN9303_SWE_INGRESS_PORT_TYPE,
+				       LAN9303_SWE_INGRESS_PORT_TYPE_VLAN);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* tag incoming packets at port 1 and 2 on their way to port 0 to be
+	 * able to discover their source port
+	 */
+	return lan9303_write_switch_reg(
+		chip, LAN9303_BM_EGRSS_PORT_TYPE,
+		LAN9303_BM_EGRSS_PORT_TYPE_SPECIAL_TAG_PORT0);
Please avoid this kind of alignment as much as possible.

    u32 val = LAN9303_BM_EGRSS_PORT_TYPE_SPECIAL_TAG_PORT0;

would do the trick for the +80 chars issue.

BTW, it'd be great to see sometime soon a cleanup patch which makes use
of such temporary u32 val variable for most of the
lan9303_write_switch_reg and lan9303_write_switch_port calls. ;-)


Thanks,

        Vivien
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help