Re: [PATCH net-next] net: bridge: add per-port group_fwd_mask with less restrictions
flat view
From: Roopa Prabhu <hidden>
Date: 2017-09-29 22:22:01
Also in:
bridge
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Nikolay Aleksandrov [off-list ref] wrote:
On 30/09/17 00:51, Stephen Hemminger wrote:quoted
On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 00:01:24 +0300 Nikolay Aleksandrov [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 29/09/17 18:14, Stephen Hemminger wrote:quoted
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 16:12:44 +0300 Nikolay Aleksandrov [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
We need to be able to transparently forward most link-local frames via tunnels (e.g. vxlan, qinq). Currently the bridge's group_fwd_mask has a mask which restricts the forwarding of STP and LACP, but we need to be able to forward these over tunnels and control that forwarding on a per-port basis thus add a new per-port group_fwd_mask option which only disallows mac pause frames to be forwarded (they're always dropped anyway). The patch does not change the current default situation - all of the others are still restricted unless configured for forwarding. We have successfully tested this patch with LACP and STP forwarding over VxLAN and qinq tunnels. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <redacted>LACP is fine, but STP must not be forwarded if STP in user or kernel mode is enabled. Please update this patch or revert it.The default has not changed, STP is still _not_ forwarded. It can be only if explicitly requested by the user and that means the port might be participating in STP but not the bridge's STP, that is explicitly forward all STP frames from that port. I don't think we have to change anything.You need to fail if user does something stupid. And DNR.I get the motivation, but it does not have to be stupid. It may be 802.1q in q, not 802.1ad where STP is already forwarded by default, or it may be that the port is participating in a different STP. Wouldn't be enough to warn the user that STP forwarding was enabled for that port, instead of forcing it off and having it only for 802.1ad ? Later when we upstream 802.1Q in q patches we'll have to work around that anyway.quoted
From 16c42db4852234c13288922c1bffbf7650e08434 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephen Hemminger <redacted> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:48:17 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] bridge: check for attempt to forward STP PDU's with STP enabled Move validation into set function and do not allow configuring forwarding of STP packets if STP is enabled. Fixes: 5af48b59f35c ("net: bridge: add per-port group_fwd_mask with less restrictions")What if the user requested explicitly to forward these frames from that port ?
exactly and this could be on a provider bridge which is just tunneling stp frames from a customer.