On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:42:40PM +0800, Jiri Benc wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:52:41 +0800, Yang, Yi wrote:
quoted
quoted
+ return ((ret != 0) ? false : true);
But I don't think this is a problematic line from my understanding,
Why not:
return ((ret != 0 == true) ? false : true) == true;
?
Sigh. This is equal to:
return !ret;
which you should use.
Ok, got it, I'll use "return !ret;", real programming art :-), I also saw
!!(condition), personally its readability is not good, typical kernel
style :-)