Re: [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] rtnetlink: rtnl_have_link_slave_info doesn't need rtnl

Switch it to rcu.

rtnl_link_slave_info_fill on to other hand does need rtnl mutex for now so
add an annotation to its caller as a reminder.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
 Change since v1:
  - don't add ASSERT_RTNL to rtnl_link_slave_info_fill and
  rtnl_link_info_fill they are only called via rtnl_link_fill.

 net/core/rtnetlink.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index 590823f70cc3..e6f9e36d9d5a 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c

@@ -522,11 +522,15 @@ static size_t rtnl_link_get_af_size(const struct net_device *dev,
 static bool rtnl_have_link_slave_info(const struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	struct net_device *master_dev;
+	bool ret = false;
 
-	master_dev = netdev_master_upper_dev_get((struct net_device *) dev);
+	rcu_read_lock();
+
+	master_dev = netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu((struct net_device *)dev);
 	if (master_dev && master_dev->rtnl_link_ops)
-		return true;
-	return false;
+		ret = true;
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int rtnl_link_slave_info_fill(struct sk_buff *skb,

@@ -598,6 +602,8 @@ static int rtnl_link_fill(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct net_device *dev)
 	struct nlattr *linkinfo;
 	int err = -EMSGSIZE;
 
+	ASSERT_RTNL();