David Ahern [off-list ref] wrote:
On 9/21/17 10:59 AM, Florian Westphal wrote:
quoted
@@ -539,6 +543,8 @@ static int rtnl_link_slave_info_fill(struct sk_buff *skb,
struct nlattr *slave_data;
int err;
+ ASSERT_RTNL();
+
[..]
master_dev = netdev_master_upper_dev_get((struct net_device *) dev);
Since rtnl_link_slave_info_fill and rtnl_link_info_fill are only called
by rtnl_link_fill and rtnl_link_fill is only called rtnl_fill_ifinfo
which as the ASSERT_RTNL why add to these lower functions as well?
I'll remove this patch in v2 and will hold it back in my private queue;
these serve more as a reminder/TODO for myself rather than anything else.