On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Daniel Mack [off-list ref] wrote:
On 09/19/2017 10:55 PM, David Miller wrote:
quoted
From: Craig Gallek <redacted>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:30:54 -0400
quoted
This was previously left as a TODO. Add the implementation and
extend the test to cover it.
Series applied, thanks.
Hmm, I think these patches need some more discussion regarding the IM
nodes handling, see the reply I sent an hour ago. Could you wait for
that before pushing your tree?
I can follow up with a patch to implement your suggestion. It's
really just an efficiency improvement, though, so I think it's ok to
handle independently. (Sorry, I haven't had a chance to play with the
implementation details yet).
Craig