Re: [PATCH] net: Convert int functions to bool

2 messages, 2 authors, 2017-09-13 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH] net: Convert int functions to bool

From: Alexey Dobriyan <hidden>
Date: 2017-09-13 22:32:02

Global function ipv6_rcv_saddr_equal and static functions
ipv6_rcv_saddr_equal and ipv4_rcv_saddr_equal currently return int.

bool is slightly more descriptive for these functions so change
their return type from int to bool.
From code generation POV "int" is better for non-inlined functions
especially on non-x86.

Patch bloats even x86_64:

	$ ./scripts/bloat-o-meter ../vmlinux-002-do-while ../obj/vmlinux
	add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 2/0 up/down: 3/0 (3)
	function                                     old     new   delta
	inet_rcv_saddr_equal                          38      40      +2
	inet_csk_get_port                           1300    1301      +1
	Total: Before=6084708, After=6084711, chg +0.00%

Re: [PATCH] net: Convert int functions to bool

From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: 2017-09-13 22:55:53

On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 01:31 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
quoted
Global function ipv6_rcv_saddr_equal and static functions
ipv6_rcv_saddr_equal and ipv4_rcv_saddr_equal currently return int.

bool is slightly more descriptive for these functions so change
their return type from int to bool.
From code generation POV "int" is better for non-inlined functions
especially on non-x86.
I don't agree with you here.  For instance:

$ size net/ipv4/*.o*
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
   9832	     26	      0	   9858	   2682	net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.o.arm.defconfig.new
   9860	     26	      0	   9886	   269e	net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.o.arm.defconfig.old
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help