Thread (20 messages) flat view 20 messages, 6 authors, 2017-09-16

Re: [PATCH] tcp: TCP_USER_TIMEOUT can not work in tcp_probe_timer()

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2017-09-11 15:13:08

On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 07:49 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 14:27 +0800, liujian56@huawei.com wrote:
quoted
From: liujian <redacted>

After the tcp socket go to ESTABLISHED stat, change IP address (server
side),
then the tcp socket will go tcp_probe_timer process.

[root@localhost net]# netstat -toe
Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address           Foreign Address         State       User       Inode      Timer
tcp        0   1104 9.81.254:personal-agent 9.84.201.213:23597      ESTABLISHED root       12819      probe (4.36/0/7)
[root@localhost net]# cat /proc/net/tcp
  sl  local_address rem_address   st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt   uid  timeout inode                                                     
   3: B1FE5109:15B3 D5C95409:5C2D 01 00000495:00000000 04:0000005E 00000000     0        7 12819 2 ffff95cdcf45a000 20 4 1 10 -1 

In my test case, tcp_write_queue_head(sk) and tcp_send_head(sk) is  same
SKB.
And ((s32)(tcp_time_stamp(tp) - start_ts) >
jiffies_to_msecs(icsk->icsk_user_timeout))
 always is false.
Interesting.
quoted
 Here use keepalive_time_elapsed(tp) to do the compare as
tcp_keepalive_timer do.

But zero window probe and TCP_USER_TIMEOUT can be used without
keepalives...


A packetdrill test would help, I will write one.
So existing code seems to work :

# cat window-probe-without-data-user-timeout.pkt

    0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
   +0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
   +0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
   +0 listen(3, 1) = 0

   +0 < S 0:0(0) win 0 <mss 1460,sackOK,nop,nop,nop,wscale 7>
   +0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 8>

// Client advertises a zero receive window, so we can't send.
  +.1 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 0
   +0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4

   +0 setsockopt(4, SOL_TCP, TCP_USER_TIMEOUT, [3000], 4) = 0
   +0 write(4, ..., 2920) = 2920

// Window probes are scheduled just like RTOs.
  +.3~+.31 > . 0:0(0) ack 1
  +.6~+.62 > . 0:0(0) ack 1
 +1.2~+1.24 > . 0:0(0) ack 1
 +2.4~+2.48 > . 0:0(0) ack 1

# ./packetdrill window-probe-without-data-user_timeout.pkt
08:10:39.306137 IP 192.0.2.1.58149 > 192.168.79.31.8080: Flags [S], seq 0, win 0, options [mss 1460,sackOK,nop,nop,nop,wscale 7], length 0
08:10:39.306166 IP 192.168.79.31.8080 > 192.0.2.1.58149: Flags [S.], seq 3982794529, ack 1, win 29200, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 8], length 0
08:10:39.406296 IP 192.0.2.1.58149 > 192.168.79.31.8080: Flags [.], ack 1, win 0, length 0
08:10:39.716004 IP 192.168.79.31.8080 > 192.0.2.1.58149: Flags [.], ack 1, win 115, length 0
08:10:40.327133 IP 192.168.79.31.8080 > 192.0.2.1.58149: Flags [.], ack 1, win 115, length 0
08:10:41.540243 IP 192.168.79.31.8080 > 192.0.2.1.58149: Flags [.], ack 1, win 115, length 0

You can see we got only 3 probes, not 4.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help