Re: [patch net] net: sched: fix memleak for chain zero
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Date: 2017-09-06 20:33:26
Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 07:40:02PM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Jiri Pirko [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Jiri Pirko <redacted> There's a memleak happening for chain 0. The thing is, chain 0 needs to be always present, not created on demand. Therefore tcf_block_get upon creation of block calls the tcf_chain_create function directly. The chain is created with refcnt == 1, which is not correct in this case and causes the memleak. So move the refcnt increment into tcf_chain_get function even for the case when chain needs to be created.Your approach could work but you just make the code even uglier than it is now: 1. The current code is already ugly for special-casing chain 0: if (--chain->refcnt == 0 && !chain->filter_chain && chain->index != 0) tcf_chain_destroy(chain); 2. With your patch, chain 0 has a different _initial_ refcnt with others.
No. Initial refcnt is the same. ! for every action that holds the chain. So actually, it returns it back where it should be.
3. Allowing an object (chain 0) exists with refcnt==0
So? That is for every chain that does not have goto_chain action pointing at. Please read the code.
Compare it with my patch: 1. No special-case for chain 0, the above ugly part is removed 2. Every chain is equal and created with refcnt==1 3. Any chain with refcnt==0 is destroyed