On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 14:24 +0000, Waskiewicz Jr, Peter wrote:
On 8/25/17 5:19 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
quoted
quoted
Tested with Intel XL710 NIC with Cisco 3172 switch.
It would be even slightly better if the irqbalance service is turned
off outside.
Yes, if you don't turn-off (kill) irqbalance it will move around the
IRQs behind your back...
Or you can use the --banirq option to irqbalance to ignore your device's
interrupts as targets for balancing.
Oh, I wasn't aware of this parameter. I will be glad to have try later.
Meanwhile, in my test above, the irqbalance service just affect result
very little.
Cheers,
-PJ