Re: [PATCH 0/2] net: Fix crashes due to activity during suspend
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: 2017-08-23 17:13:22
Also in:
linux-pm, linux-renesas-soc, lkml
On 08/23/2017 04:45 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Florian, On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Florian Fainelli [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 08/22/2017 11:37 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:quoted
If an Ethernet device is used while the device is suspended, the system may crash. E.g. on sh73a0/kzm9g and r8a73a4/ape6evm, the external Ethernet chip is driven by a PM controlled clock. If the Ethernet registers are accessed while the clock is not running, the system will crash with an imprecise external abort. This patch series fixes two of such crashes: 1. The first patch prevents the PHY polling state machine from accessing PHY registers while a device is suspended, 2. The second patch prevents the net core from trying to transmit packets when an smsc911x device is suspended. Both crashes can be reproduced on sh73a0/kzm9g and r8a73a4/ape6evm during s2ram (rarely), or by using pm_test (more likely to trigger): # echo 0 > /sys/module/printk/parameters/console_suspend # echo platform > /sys/power/pm_test # echo mem > /sys/power/state With this series applied, my test systems survive a loop of 100 test suspends.It seems to me like part, if not the entire problem is that smsc91xx's suspend and resume functions are way too simplistic and absolutely do not manage the PHY during suspend/resume, the PHY state machine is not even stopped, so of course, this will cause bus errors if you access those registers. You are addressing this as part of patch 2, but this seems to me like this is still a bit incomplete and you'd need at least phy_stop() and/or phy_suspend() (does a power down of the PHY) and phy_start() and/or phy_resume() calls to complete the PHY state machine shutdown during suspend. Have you tried that?Unfortunately that doesn't help. In state PHY_HALTED, the PHY state machine still calls the .adjust_link() callback while the device is suspended.
Humm that is correct yes.
Do you have a clue? This is too far beyond my phy-foo...
I was initially contemplating a revert of
7ad813f208533cebfcc32d3d7474dc1677d1b09a ("net: phy: Correctly process
PHY_HALTED in phy_stop_machine()") but this is not the root of the
problem. The problem really is that phy_stop() does not wait for the PHY
state machine to be stopped so you cannot rely on that and past the
function return be offered any guarantees that adjust_link is not called.
We seem to be getting away with that in most drivers because when we see
phydev->link = 0, we either do nothing or actually turn of the HW block.
How about we export phy_stop_machine() to drivers which would provide a
synchronization point that would ensure that no HW accesses are done
past this point?
I am absolutely not clear on the implications of using a freezable
workqueue with respect to the PHY state machine and how devices are
going to wind-up being powered down or not...
Thanks!
--
Florian