From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> Date: 2017-08-29 20:08:03
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Implement VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET (patch 1) and
add a feature bit to signal support (patch 2)
Further details in the individual patches.
Willem de Bruijn (2):
virtio_net: implement VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET
virtio_net: enable probing for NEEDS_RESET support
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h | 3 ++
include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h | 4 +++
3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--
2.14.1.342.g6490525c54-goog
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> Date: 2017-08-29 20:08:04
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Implement the reset communication request defined in the VIRTIO 1.0
specification and introduces in Linux in commit c00bbcf862896 ("virtio:
add VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET device status bit").
Since that patch, the virtio-net driver has added a virtnet_reset
function that implements the requested behavior through calls to the
power management freeze and restore functions.
That function has recently been reverted when its sole caller was
updated. Bring it back and listen for the request from the host on
the config channel.
Implement the feature analogous to other config requests. In
particular, acknowledge the request in the same manner as the
NET_S_ANNOUNCE link announce request, by responding with a new
VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_${TYPE} command. On reception, the host must check
the config status register for success or failure.
The existing freeze handler verifies that no config changes are
running concurrently. Elide this check for reset. The request is
always handled from the config workqueue. No other config requests
can be active or scheduled concurrently on vi->config.
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h | 4 +++
2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
@@ -1458,12 +1458,11 @@ static void virtnet_netpoll(struct net_device *dev)}#endif-staticvoidvirtnet_ack_link_announce(structvirtnet_info*vi)+staticvoidvirtnet_ack(structvirtnet_info*vi,u8class,u8cmd){rtnl_lock();-if(!virtnet_send_command(vi,VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_ANNOUNCE,-VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_ANNOUNCE_ACK,NULL))-dev_warn(&vi->dev->dev,"Failed to ack link announce.\n");+if(!virtnet_send_command(vi,class,cmd,NULL))+dev_warn(&vi->dev->dev,"Failed to ack %u.%u\n",class,cmd);rtnl_unlock();}
@@ -1857,13 +1856,16 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops virtnet_ethtool_ops = {.set_link_ksettings=virtnet_set_link_ksettings,};-staticvoidvirtnet_freeze_down(structvirtio_device*vdev)+staticvoidvirtnet_freeze_down(structvirtio_device*vdev,boolin_reset){structvirtnet_info*vi=vdev->priv;inti;-/* Make sure no work handler is accessing the device */-flush_work(&vi->config_work);+/* Make sure no work handler is accessing the device,+*unlessthiscallismadefromtheresetworkhandleritself.+*/+if(!in_reset)+flush_work(&vi->config_work);netif_device_detach(vi->dev);netif_tx_disable(vi->dev);
@@ -1906,6 +1909,45 @@ static int virtnet_restore_up(struct virtio_device *vdev)returnerr;}+staticintvirtnet_reset(structvirtnet_info*vi)+{+structvirtio_device*dev=vi->vdev;+boolfailed;+intret;++virtio_config_disable(dev);+failed=dev->config->get_status(dev)&VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED;+virtnet_freeze_down(dev,true);+remove_vq_common(vi);++virtio_add_status(dev,VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);+virtio_add_status(dev,VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER);++/* Restore the failed status (see virtio_device_restore). */+if(failed)+virtio_add_status(dev,VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED);++ret=virtio_finalize_features(dev);+if(ret)+gotoerr;++ret=virtnet_restore_up(dev);+if(ret)+gotoerr;++ret=virtnet_set_queues(vi,vi->curr_queue_pairs);+if(ret)+gotoerr;++virtio_add_status(dev,VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);+virtio_config_enable(dev);+return0;++err:+virtio_add_status(dev,VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED);+returnret;+}+staticintvirtnet_set_guest_offloads(structvirtnet_info*vi,u64offloads){structscatterlistsg;
@@ -245,4 +245,8 @@ struct virtio_net_ctrl_mq {#define VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS 5#define VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS_SET 0+/* Signal that the driver received and executed the reset command. */+#define VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_RESET 6+#define VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_RESET_ACK 0+#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_NET_H */
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> Date: 2017-08-29 20:08:04
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Implement a mechanism to signal that a virtio device implements the
VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET command.
Testing for VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET support by issuing the request
and verifying the reset state would require an expensive state change.
To avoid that, add a status bit to the feature register used during
feature negotiation between host and guest.
Set the bit for virtio-net, which supports the feature.
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 ++
include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Date: 2017-08-29 20:16:58
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:07:59PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Implement a mechanism to signal that a virtio device implements the
VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET command.
Testing for VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET support by issuing the request
and verifying the reset state would require an expensive state change.
To avoid that, add a status bit to the feature register used during
feature negotiation between host and guest.
Set the bit for virtio-net, which supports the feature.
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
All virtio 1 devices have the reset feature so maybe guest does
not need this flag. Does device need it? Does device really
care that guest can't recover?
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Date: 2017-08-29 20:20:34
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:07:58PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Implement the reset communication request defined in the VIRTIO 1.0
specification and introduces in Linux in commit c00bbcf862896 ("virtio:
add VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET device status bit").
Since that patch, the virtio-net driver has added a virtnet_reset
function that implements the requested behavior through calls to the
power management freeze and restore functions.
That function has recently been reverted when its sole caller was
updated. Bring it back and listen for the request from the host on
the config channel.
Implement the feature analogous to other config requests. In
particular, acknowledge the request in the same manner as the
NET_S_ANNOUNCE link announce request, by responding with a new
VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_${TYPE} command. On reception, the host must check
the config status register for success or failure.
Pls make it clearer why do you need these interface extensions.
The existing freeze handler verifies that no config changes are
running concurrently. Elide this check for reset. The request is
always handled from the config workqueue. No other config requests
can be active or scheduled concurrently on vi->config.
You need to prevent packet TX from being in progress.
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h | 4 +++
virtio dev or another virtio TC list must be Cc'd on any proposed API changes.
@@ -1458,12 +1458,11 @@ static void virtnet_netpoll(struct net_device *dev)}#endif-staticvoidvirtnet_ack_link_announce(structvirtnet_info*vi)+staticvoidvirtnet_ack(structvirtnet_info*vi,u8class,u8cmd){rtnl_lock();-if(!virtnet_send_command(vi,VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_ANNOUNCE,-VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_ANNOUNCE_ACK,NULL))-dev_warn(&vi->dev->dev,"Failed to ack link announce.\n");+if(!virtnet_send_command(vi,class,cmd,NULL))+dev_warn(&vi->dev->dev,"Failed to ack %u.%u\n",class,cmd);rtnl_unlock();}
@@ -1857,13 +1856,16 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops virtnet_ethtool_ops = {.set_link_ksettings=virtnet_set_link_ksettings,};-staticvoidvirtnet_freeze_down(structvirtio_device*vdev)+staticvoidvirtnet_freeze_down(structvirtio_device*vdev,boolin_reset){structvirtnet_info*vi=vdev->priv;inti;-/* Make sure no work handler is accessing the device */-flush_work(&vi->config_work);+/* Make sure no work handler is accessing the device,+*unlessthiscallismadefromtheresetworkhandleritself.+*/+if(!in_reset)+flush_work(&vi->config_work);netif_device_detach(vi->dev);netif_tx_disable(vi->dev);
@@ -1906,6 +1909,45 @@ static int virtnet_restore_up(struct virtio_device *vdev)returnerr;}+staticintvirtnet_reset(structvirtnet_info*vi)+{+structvirtio_device*dev=vi->vdev;+boolfailed;+intret;++virtio_config_disable(dev);+failed=dev->config->get_status(dev)&VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED;+virtnet_freeze_down(dev,true);+remove_vq_common(vi);++virtio_add_status(dev,VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);+virtio_add_status(dev,VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER);++/* Restore the failed status (see virtio_device_restore). */+if(failed)+virtio_add_status(dev,VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED);++ret=virtio_finalize_features(dev);+if(ret)+gotoerr;++ret=virtnet_restore_up(dev);+if(ret)+gotoerr;++ret=virtnet_set_queues(vi,vi->curr_queue_pairs);+if(ret)+gotoerr;++virtio_add_status(dev,VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);+virtio_config_enable(dev);+return0;++err:+virtio_add_status(dev,VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED);+returnret;+}+staticintvirtnet_set_guest_offloads(structvirtnet_info*vi,u64offloads){structscatterlistsg;
@@ -245,4 +245,8 @@ struct virtio_net_ctrl_mq {#define VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS 5#define VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS_SET 0+/* Signal that the driver received and executed the reset command. */+#define VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_RESET 6+#define VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_RESET_ACK 0+#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_NET_H */
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> Date: 2017-08-29 20:28:22
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:07:59PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
quoted
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Implement a mechanism to signal that a virtio device implements the
VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET command.
Testing for VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET support by issuing the request
and verifying the reset state would require an expensive state change.
To avoid that, add a status bit to the feature register used during
feature negotiation between host and guest.
Set the bit for virtio-net, which supports the feature.
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
All virtio 1 devices have the reset feature
I don't quite follow. No device drivers implement this request currently?
so maybe guest does
not need this flag. Does device need it? Does device really
care that guest can't recover?
If all device drivers support it, then the flag is not needed.
But as long as legacy device drivers can exist that do not support
this feature, it has to have a way of differentiating between the two.
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Date: 2017-08-29 20:38:07
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:27:41PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:07:59PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
quoted
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Implement a mechanism to signal that a virtio device implements the
VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET command.
Testing for VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET support by issuing the request
and verifying the reset state would require an expensive state change.
To avoid that, add a status bit to the feature register used during
feature negotiation between host and guest.
Set the bit for virtio-net, which supports the feature.
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
All virtio 1 devices have the reset feature
I don't quite follow. No device drivers implement this request currently?
Depends. Spec 1.0 describes the bit and that driver can respond
by reseting the device. You seem to do something else
in this patchset, but as designed in 1.0 it does not seem to need
a feature bit.
quoted
so maybe guest does
not need this flag. Does device need it? Does device really
care that guest can't recover?
If all device drivers support it, then the flag is not needed.
But as long as legacy device drivers can exist that do not support
this feature, it has to have a way of differentiating between the two.
Why? Device won't set this unless it's in a bad state. In that case,
setting the bit is harmless even if drivers ignore it.
--
MST
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> Date: 2017-08-29 21:03:10
+ virtio-dev
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:27:41PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:07:59PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
quoted
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Implement a mechanism to signal that a virtio device implements the
VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET command.
Testing for VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET support by issuing the request
and verifying the reset state would require an expensive state change.
To avoid that, add a status bit to the feature register used during
feature negotiation between host and guest.
Set the bit for virtio-net, which supports the feature.
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
All virtio 1 devices have the reset feature
I don't quite follow. No device drivers implement this request currently?
Depends. Spec 1.0 describes the bit and that driver can respond
by reseting the device. You seem to do something else
in this patchset, but as designed in 1.0 it does not seem to need
a feature bit.
I see. So support is designed to be best effort?
The feature bit is only needed if driver support is optional.
The ack response is necessary if the device acts differently
depending on whether the reset happened. The device has
to reset its local state, too, so I think that this is needed.
quoted
quoted
so maybe guest does
not need this flag. Does device need it? Does device really
care that guest can't recover?
If all device drivers support it, then the flag is not needed.
But as long as legacy device drivers can exist that do not support
this feature, it has to have a way of differentiating between the two.
Why? Device won't set this unless it's in a bad state. In that case,
setting the bit is harmless even if drivers ignore it.
The goal is for the device to be able to rely on the driver reset to get
to a good state even if it gets it into a bad state.
That allows it to implement optimizations that could get it into that bad
state.
In particular, in the edge case where the device performs backpressure,
takes the descriptor out of the avail ring and does not immediately post
it to the used ring.
A reset will make the guest free all delayed packets and treat any
unsent and unacknowledged as network drops. This allows the
device to indeed drop long delayed packets when they eventually
surface (e.g., leave a qdisc queue). This is of course not safe with
zerocopy packets.
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Date: 2017-08-29 21:13:52
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 05:02:29PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
+ virtio-dev
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:27:41PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:07:59PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
quoted
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Implement a mechanism to signal that a virtio device implements the
VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET command.
Testing for VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET support by issuing the request
and verifying the reset state would require an expensive state change.
To avoid that, add a status bit to the feature register used during
feature negotiation between host and guest.
Set the bit for virtio-net, which supports the feature.
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
All virtio 1 devices have the reset feature
I don't quite follow. No device drivers implement this request currently?
Depends. Spec 1.0 describes the bit and that driver can respond
by reseting the device. You seem to do something else
in this patchset, but as designed in 1.0 it does not seem to need
a feature bit.
I see. So support is designed to be best effort?
The feature bit is only needed if driver support is optional.
The ack response is necessary if the device acts differently
depending on whether the reset happened. The device has
to reset its local state, too, so I think that this is needed.
That reset should only happen when guest driver resets the device.
And spec already has a mechanism for that anyway.
quoted
quoted
quoted
so maybe guest does
not need this flag. Does device need it? Does device really
care that guest can't recover?
If all device drivers support it, then the flag is not needed.
But as long as legacy device drivers can exist that do not support
this feature, it has to have a way of differentiating between the two.
Why? Device won't set this unless it's in a bad state. In that case,
setting the bit is harmless even if drivers ignore it.
The goal is for the device to be able to rely on the driver reset to get
to a good state even if it gets it into a bad state.
That allows it to implement optimizations that could get it into that bad
state.
I see. I don't think this is what the need reset was designed for.
We can extend it to cover this case but let's add a bit more
documentation then.
And in particular won't it be better if we could just reset one ring,
and not the whole device state? This might be nicer so flows on other
rings aren't disrupted.
In particular, in the edge case where the device performs backpressure,
takes the descriptor out of the avail ring and does not immediately post
it to the used ring.
A reset will make the guest free all delayed packets and treat any
unsent and unacknowledged as network drops. This allows the
device to indeed drop long delayed packets when they eventually
surface (e.g., leave a qdisc queue).
In this particular case, won't it be easier for device to just
report all packets as used, without involving the guest?
This is of course not safe with
zerocopy packets.
I wonder if we can teach kernel to drop zero copy packets too.
--
MST
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> Date: 2017-08-29 22:39:13
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 05:02:29PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
quoted
+ virtio-dev
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:27:41PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:07:59PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
quoted
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Implement a mechanism to signal that a virtio device implements the
VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET command.
Testing for VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET support by issuing the request
and verifying the reset state would require an expensive state change.
To avoid that, add a status bit to the feature register used during
feature negotiation between host and guest.
Set the bit for virtio-net, which supports the feature.
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
All virtio 1 devices have the reset feature
I don't quite follow. No device drivers implement this request currently?
Depends. Spec 1.0 describes the bit and that driver can respond
by reseting the device. You seem to do something else
in this patchset, but as designed in 1.0 it does not seem to need
a feature bit.
I see. So support is designed to be best effort?
The feature bit is only needed if driver support is optional.
The ack response is necessary if the device acts differently
depending on whether the reset happened. The device has
to reset its local state, too, so I think that this is needed.
That reset should only happen when guest driver resets the device.
And spec already has a mechanism for that anyway.
And the device can read the ring state to see whether it has reset,
perhaps.
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
so maybe guest does
not need this flag. Does device need it? Does device really
care that guest can't recover?
If all device drivers support it, then the flag is not needed.
But as long as legacy device drivers can exist that do not support
this feature, it has to have a way of differentiating between the two.
Why? Device won't set this unless it's in a bad state. In that case,
setting the bit is harmless even if drivers ignore it.
The goal is for the device to be able to rely on the driver reset to get
to a good state even if it gets it into a bad state.
That allows it to implement optimizations that could get it into that bad
state.
I see. I don't think this is what the need reset was designed for.
We can extend it to cover this case but let's add a bit more
documentation then.
Okay.
And in particular won't it be better if we could just reset one ring,
and not the whole device state? This might be nicer so flows on other
rings aren't disrupted.
Indeed. But that would require a different request, then? It also
depends on the use case. A full device reset is a big hammer,
but if used only to get out of rare edge cases, it is good enough.
quoted
In particular, in the edge case where the device performs backpressure,
takes the descriptor out of the avail ring and does not immediately post
it to the used ring.
A reset will make the guest free all delayed packets and treat any
unsent and unacknowledged as network drops. This allows the
device to indeed drop long delayed packets when they eventually
surface (e.g., leave a qdisc queue).
In this particular case, won't it be easier for device to just
report all packets as used, without involving the guest?
When the device can just iterate over the outstanding packet, yeah,
that's actually simpler.
quoted
This is of course not safe with
zerocopy packets.
I wonder if we can teach kernel to drop zero copy packets too.
Your point about changing frags[] underneath a cloned skb really does
make that hard. We might be able to mitigate individual specific cases
of high latency, such as TC queue occupancy.
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> Date: 2017-10-05 16:19:23
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:07:58PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
quoted
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Implement the reset communication request defined in the VIRTIO 1.0
specification and introduces in Linux in commit c00bbcf862896 ("virtio:
add VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET device status bit").
Since that patch, the virtio-net driver has added a virtnet_reset
function that implements the requested behavior through calls to the
power management freeze and restore functions.
That function has recently been reverted when its sole caller was
updated. Bring it back and listen for the request from the host on
the config channel.
Implement the feature analogous to other config requests. In
particular, acknowledge the request in the same manner as the
NET_S_ANNOUNCE link announce request, by responding with a new
VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_${TYPE} command. On reception, the host must check
the config status register for success or failure.
Pls make it clearer why do you need these interface extensions.
quoted
The existing freeze handler verifies that no config changes are
running concurrently. Elide this check for reset. The request is
always handled from the config workqueue. No other config requests
can be active or scheduled concurrently on vi->config.
You need to prevent packet TX from being in progress.
I had another look at this.
As of commit 713a98d90c5e ("virtio-net: serialize tx routine during reset")
virtnet_freeze_down calls synchronize_net() after stopping the queues
to quiesce the device before any further actions. This should suffice for
virtnet_reset, too.
The control path can indeed be much simpler than my initial patchset.
The host can read vdev->status to observe when the reset went through.
It adds flag VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET to request the reset.
This flag is cleared by the operation itself.
quoted
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h | 4 +++
virtio dev or another virtio TC list must be Cc'd on any proposed API changes.
@@ -1458,12 +1458,11 @@ static void virtnet_netpoll(struct net_device *dev)}#endif-staticvoidvirtnet_ack_link_announce(structvirtnet_info*vi)+staticvoidvirtnet_ack(structvirtnet_info*vi,u8class,u8cmd){rtnl_lock();-if(!virtnet_send_command(vi,VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_ANNOUNCE,-VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_ANNOUNCE_ACK,NULL))-dev_warn(&vi->dev->dev,"Failed to ack link announce.\n");+if(!virtnet_send_command(vi,class,cmd,NULL))+dev_warn(&vi->dev->dev,"Failed to ack %u.%u\n",class,cmd);rtnl_unlock();}
@@ -1857,13 +1856,16 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops virtnet_ethtool_ops = {.set_link_ksettings=virtnet_set_link_ksettings,};-staticvoidvirtnet_freeze_down(structvirtio_device*vdev)+staticvoidvirtnet_freeze_down(structvirtio_device*vdev,boolin_reset){structvirtnet_info*vi=vdev->priv;inti;-/* Make sure no work handler is accessing the device */-flush_work(&vi->config_work);+/* Make sure no work handler is accessing the device,+*unlessthiscallismadefromtheresetworkhandleritself.+*/+if(!in_reset)+flush_work(&vi->config_work);netif_device_detach(vi->dev);netif_tx_disable(vi->dev);
@@ -1906,6 +1909,45 @@ static int virtnet_restore_up(struct virtio_device *vdev)returnerr;}+staticintvirtnet_reset(structvirtnet_info*vi)+{+structvirtio_device*dev=vi->vdev;+boolfailed;+intret;++virtio_config_disable(dev);+failed=dev->config->get_status(dev)&VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED;+virtnet_freeze_down(dev,true);+remove_vq_common(vi);++virtio_add_status(dev,VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);+virtio_add_status(dev,VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER);++/* Restore the failed status (see virtio_device_restore). */+if(failed)+virtio_add_status(dev,VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED);++ret=virtio_finalize_features(dev);+if(ret)+gotoerr;++ret=virtnet_restore_up(dev);+if(ret)+gotoerr;++ret=virtnet_set_queues(vi,vi->curr_queue_pairs);+if(ret)+gotoerr;++virtio_add_status(dev,VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);+virtio_config_enable(dev);+return0;++err:+virtio_add_status(dev,VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED);+returnret;+}+staticintvirtnet_set_guest_offloads(structvirtnet_info*vi,u64offloads){structscatterlistsg;
@@ -245,4 +245,8 @@ struct virtio_net_ctrl_mq {#define VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS 5#define VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS_SET 0+/* Signal that the driver received and executed the reset command. */+#define VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_RESET 6+#define VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_RESET_ACK 0+#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_NET_H */--