Re: [PATCH net-next] bridge: fdb add and delete tracepoints
flat view
From: Roopa Prabhu <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-28 15:03:47
Also in:
bridge
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Florian Fainelli [off-list ref] wrote:
On 08/27/2017 02:33 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:quoted
From: Roopa Prabhu <redacted> Tracepoints to trace bridge forwarding database updates.Thanks for adding this!quoted
Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <redacted> --- include/trace/events/bridge.h | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 7 ++++ net/core/net-traces.c | 6 +++ 3 files changed, 111 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/trace/events/bridge.hdiff --git a/include/trace/events/bridge.h b/include/trace/events/bridge.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e2d52cf --- /dev/null +++ b/include/trace/events/bridge.h@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ +#undef TRACE_SYSTEM +#define TRACE_SYSTEM bridge + +#if !defined(_TRACE_BRIDGE_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ) +#define _TRACE_BRIDGE_H + +#include <linux/netdevice.h> +#include <linux/tracepoint.h> + +#include "../../../net/bridge/br_private.h" + +TRACE_EVENT(br_fdb_add, + + TP_PROTO(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct net_device *dev, + const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, u16 nlh_flags), + + TP_ARGS(ndm, dev, addr, vid, nlh_flags), + + TP_STRUCT__entry( + __field(u8, ndm_flags) + __string(dev, dev->name) + __array(unsigned char, addr, 6)Can you use ETH_ALEN instead of 6 here?quoted
+ __field(u16, vid) + __field(u16, nlh_flags) + ), + + TP_fast_assign( + __assign_str(dev, dev->name); + memcpy(__entry->addr, addr, 6);Likewisequoted
+ __entry->vid = vid; + __entry->nlh_flags = nlh_flags; + __entry->ndm_flags = ndm->ndm_flags; + ), + + TP_printk("dev %s addr %02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x vid %u nlh_flags %x ndm_flags = %x",I wonder if we could make %pM work for TP_printk() as this would simplify the argument list a bitt. Can you use %04x for vid, nlh_flags and %02x for ndm_flags?
one thing here.., i think %u is better for vid. bridge driver debug prints also use %u for vid.