[net-next PATCH 5/9] bpf: more SK_SKB selftests
flat view
STALE3348d
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Date: 2017-08-28 14:11:37
Subsystem:
bpf [general] (safe dynamic programs and tools), bpf [selftests] (test runners & infrastructure), kernel selftest framework, the rest · Maintainers:
Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Shuah Khan, Shuah Khan, Linus Torvalds
Tests packet read/writes and additional skb fields. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 353d170..8eb0995 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c@@ -1119,6 +1119,104 @@ struct test_val { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, }, { + "invalid access of tc_classid for SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", + }, + { + "check skb->mark is writeable by SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "check skb->tc_index is writeable by SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_index)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "check skb->priority is writeable by SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, priority)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "direct packet read for SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "direct packet write for SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "overlapping checks for direct packet access SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 4), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 6), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 6), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { "check skb->mark is not writeable by sockets", .insns = { BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1,