Re: [PATCH 3/6] mpls: add VPLS entry points
From: David Lamparter <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-21 15:55:27
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 04:01:15PM +0200, Amine Kherbouche wrote:
On 08/16/2017 07:01 PM, David Lamparter wrote:quoted
This wires up the neccessary calls for VPLS into the MPLS forwarding pieces. Since CONFIG_MPLS_VPLS doesn't exist yet in Kconfig, it'll never be enabled, so we're on the stubs for now.
[...]
quoted
+ if (rt->rt_payload_type == MPT_VPLS) + return vpls_rcv(skb, dev, pt, rt, hdr, orig_dev);you should get the ret value of vpls_rcv() and increment stats if error occurs.
An error in vpls_rcv() is not a receive error on the outer device's MPLS layer; the packet was received correctly (and counted for that at the beginning of mpls_forward()) and dispatched onto an appropriately configured VPLS device. vpls_rcv() counts its own stats on the inner device. [...]
quoted
+static inline int vpls_rcv(skb, in_dev, pt, rt, hdr, orig_dev) +{ + kfree_skb(skb); + return NET_RX_DROP;just return NET_RX_DROP;
This is not correct; the skb ownership is passed down to vpls_rcv(), which itself will pass it on via netif_rx(). This is also why the call in mpls_forward() does *not* "goto drop", instead directly returning. vpls_rcv() consumes the skb in all cases. Doing this the other way around would incur extra overhead through a skb_clone() in vpls_rcv() before giving it to netif_rx(). Note that the vpls_rcv() dummy function in this patch can't be called because the kernel will refuse to install a VPLS route into the label table (the is_vpls_device() check will be 0). The dummy is just to keep the code tidy. [...]
quoted
+#endifs/ #endif/#endif /* CONFIG_MPLS_VPLS *//
Fixed in next ver (along with the bugged prototype reported by the build bot.) Cheers, -David