On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Liping Zhang [off-list ref] wrote:
2017-08-16 7:35 GMT+08:00 Pravin Shelar [off-list ref]:
[...]
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/actions.c b/net/openvswitch/actions.c
index e4610676299b..f849ef52853f 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/actions.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/actions.c
@@ -921,6 +921,7 @@ static int output_userspace(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb,
/* Include actions. */
upcall.actions = actions;
upcall.actions_len = actions_len;
+ upcall.actions_attrlen = OVS_CB(skb)->acts_origlen;
OVS_CB acts_origlen should be accessible in upcall_msg_size (), is
there reason to add this member to struct dp_upcall_info?
Hmm... this means we should add an extra parameter to the upcall_msg_size()
function, i.e.:
static size_t upcall_msg_size(const struct dp_upcall_info *upcall_info,
- unsigned int hdrlen)
+ unsigned int hdrlen, int actions_attrlen)
I am fine with the parameter.
Thanks.