RE: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/3] ipv6: Prevent unexpected sk->sk_prot changes
From: Boris Pismenny <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-15 13:08:08
Hi Eric,
-----Original Message----- From: Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.dumazet@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 14:59 To: Ilya Lesokhin <redacted> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; davem@davemloft.net; davejwatson@fb.com; Aviad Yehezkel [off-list ref]; Boris Pismenny [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/3] ipv6: Prevent unexpected sk->sk_prot changes On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 14:08 +0300, Ilya Lesokhin wrote:quoted
With this patch IPV6 code ensure that only sockets with the expected sk->sk_prot are converted to IPV4. Signed-off-by: Boris Pismenny <redacted> --- net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)diff --git a/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c b/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c index 02d795f..318cd344 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c +++ b/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c@@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ static int do_ipv6_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, intlevel, int optname,quoted
if (val == PF_INET) { struct ipv6_txoptions *opt; struct sk_buff *pktopt; + struct proto *expected_prot; if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_RAW) break;@@ -199,6 +200,17 @@ static int do_ipv6_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, intlevel, int optname,quoted
break; } + if (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP && + sk->sk_prot != &tcpv6_prot) + break; + + expected_prot = &udpv6_prot; + if (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_UDPLITE) + expected_prot = &udplitev6_prot; + + if (sk->sk_prot != expected_prot) + break; + fl6_free_socklist(sk); __ipv6_sock_mc_close(sk);I am afraid I do not understand this patch at all. Direct references to tcpv6_prot, udpv6_prot, and udplitev6_prot in net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c looks completely broken. Please provide something cleaner, maybe by adding a new method (implementation would then be provided in TCP / UDP code )
The IPV6_ADDRFORM socket option assumes that when (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP) then the sk_proto is set to tcpv6_prot and it replaces it with tcp_prot. This patch ensures that the IPV6_ADDRFORM socket option doesn't replace the socket's sk_prot to tcp when it is not expected. For example, TLS sockets also replace sk_prot, and we need to prevent IPV6_ADDRFORM from overriding these. Are you suggesting that each socket protocol will provide a method that converts it from IPv6 to IPv4?