[PATCH net 0/2] Two BPF fixes for s390 · Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> · 2017-08-04
[PATCH net 1/2] bpf, s390: fix jit branch offset related to ldimm64 · Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> · 2017-08-04
Re: [PATCH net 1/2] bpf, s390: fix jit branch offset related to ldimm64 · Michael Holzheu <hidden> · 2017-08-04
Re: [PATCH net 1/2] bpf, s390: fix jit branch offset related to ldimm64 · Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> · 2017-08-04
Re: [PATCH net 1/2] bpf, s390: fix jit branch offset related to ldimm64 · Michael Holzheu <hidden> · 2017-08-04
Re: [PATCH net 1/2] bpf, s390: fix jit branch offset related to ldimm64 · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2017-08-04
[PATCH net 2/2] bpf, s390: fix build for libbpf and selftest suite · Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> · 2017-08-04
Re: [PATCH net 0/2] Two BPF fixes for s390 · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2017-08-04

Re: [PATCH net 1/2] bpf, s390: fix jit branch offset related to ldimm64

From: Michael Holzheu <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-04 17:10:42

Am Fri, 04 Aug 2017 15:52:47 +0200
schrieb Daniel Borkmann [off-list ref]:

On 08/04/2017 03:44 PM, Michael Holzheu wrote:

quoted

Am Fri,  4 Aug 2017 14:20:54 +0200
schrieb Daniel Borkmann [off-list ref]:

[...]

quoted

What about "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org"?

Handled by Dave, see also: Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt +117

Thanks, good to know! At least I would vote for "Cc: stable".

Michael