Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Remove spin_unlock_wait()
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2017-07-07 08:44:47
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml, netfilter-devel
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:31:28AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Here's a quick list of all the use cases:
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:
- This is I believe the 'original', historic spin_unlock_wait() usecase that
still exists in the kernel. spin_unlock_wait() is only used in a rare case,
when the netfilter hash is resized via nf_conntrack_hash_resize() - which is
a very heavy operation to begin with. It will no doubt get slower with the
proposed changes, but it probably does not matter. A networking person
Acked-by would be nice though.
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c:
- Locking of the ATA port in ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler(), presumably this can
race with IRQs and ioctls() on other CPUs. Very likely not performance
sensitive in any fashion, on IO errors things stop for many seconds anyway.
ipc/sem.c:
- A rare race condition branch in the SysV IPC semaphore freeing code in
exit_sem() - where even the main code flow is not performance sensitive,
because typical database workloads get their semaphore arrays during startup
and don't ever do heavy runtime allocation/freeing of them.
kernel/sched/completion.c:
- completion_done(). This is actually a (comparatively) rarely used completion
API call - almost all the upstream usecases are in drivers, plus two in
filesystems - neither usecase seems in a performance critical hot path.
Completions typically involve scheduling and context switching, so in the
worst case the proposed change adds overhead to a scheduling slow path.You missed the one in do_exit(), which I thought was the original one.