Re: [PATCH net] bpf: don't zero out the info struct in bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd()
From: Jakub Kicinski <hidden>
Date: 2017-07-25 23:20:36
On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 16:15:47 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:59:49 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:quoted
quoted
@@ -418,6 +420,8 @@ static void test_bpf_obj_id(void) nr_id_found++; err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(prog_fd, &prog_info, &info_len); + prog_infos[i].jited_prog_insns = 0; + prog_infos[i].xlated_prog_insns = 0;Can you elaborate why this one above is needed?Ah, I removed the comment about it at the last minute. The check below compares the info we get here with info we got reading the programs in the earlier loop - using memcmp(). This call, however, doesn't fill in the pointers for jited and xlated images, so the memcmp() would fail. It used to work when bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd() was zeroing info, since the pointers would be cleared by it, and no dump ever returned, it didn't matter that the call sites differ.
FWIW the comment was this: + /* Clear the insns pointers, we're not requesting dumps here. + * Otherwise the byte-by-byte comparison below would fail. + */
quoted
quoted
CHECK(err || info_len != sizeof(struct bpf_prog_info) || memcmp(&prog_info, &prog_infos[i], info_len), "get-prog-info(next_id->fd)",