Thread (13 messages) flat view 13 messages, 4 authors, 2017-07-11

Re: [PATCH iproute2 V3 3/4] rdma: Add link object

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Date: 2017-07-10 18:28:31
Also in: linux-rdma

Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 06:22:23PM CEST, leon@kernel.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:13:07AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
quoted
Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 09:55:40AM CEST, leon@kernel.org wrote:
quoted
From: Leon Romanovsky <redacted>

Link (port) object represent struct ib_port to the user space.

Link properties:
* Port capabilities
* IB subnet prefix
* LID, SM_LID and LMC
* Port state
* Physical state

Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <redacted>
---
rdma/Makefile |   2 +-
rdma/link.c   | 280 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
rdma/rdma.c   |   3 +-
rdma/utils.c  |   5 ++
4 files changed, 288 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 rdma/link.c
diff --git a/rdma/Makefile b/rdma/Makefile
index 123d7ac5..1a9e4b1a 100644
--- a/rdma/Makefile
+++ b/rdma/Makefile
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ include ../Config
ifeq ($(HAVE_MNL),y)

-RDMA_OBJ = rdma.o utils.o dev.o
+RDMA_OBJ = rdma.o utils.o dev.o link.o

TARGETS=rdma
CFLAGS += $(shell $(PKG_CONFIG) libmnl --cflags)
diff --git a/rdma/link.c b/rdma/link.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f92b4cef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rdma/link.c
@@ -0,0 +1,280 @@
+/*
+ * link.c	RDMA tool
+ *
+ *              This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ *              modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
+ *              as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
+ *              2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * Authors:     Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
+ */
+
+#include "rdma.h"
+
+static int link_help(struct rdma *rd)
+{
+	pr_out("Usage: %s link show [DEV/PORT_INDEX]\n", rd->filename);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void link_print_caps(struct nlattr **tb)
+{
+	uint64_t caps;
+	uint32_t idx;
+
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: move to indexes when kernel will start exporting them.
Not exported yet?
Not yet, I want to minimize the UAPI export from kernel before user-space
part is accepted.
I don't get it. If you need it in userspace, you should expose it. Why
to wait? What am I missing?

[...]

quoted
quoted
+		rd->port_idx = port ? :1;
"port ? : 1"
Yeah, legal C, the same as (port) ? port : 1
ihttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%3F:#C

I was referring to the missing " ". I'm a nitpicker :)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help