Re: [PATCH net] ip[6]: don't register inet[6]dev when dev is down
From: Cong Wang <hidden>
Date: 2017-07-06 18:17:05
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Nicolas Dichtel [off-list ref] wrote:
Le 06/07/2017 à 00:43, Cong Wang a écrit :quoted
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Nicolas Dichtel [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
When a device changes from one netns to another, it's first unregistered, then the netns reference is updated and the dev is registered in the new netns. Thus, when a slave moves to another netns, it is first unregistered. This triggers a NETDEV_UNREGISTER event which is caught by the bonding driver. The driver calls bond_release(), which calls dev_set_mtu() and thus triggers NETDEV_CHANGEMTU (the device is still in the old netns).I think in this special case it is meaningless to send NETDEV_CHANGEMTU, because the device is dying within its old netns, who still cares about its mtu change? Something like the attached patch...Yes, your patch seems good and I hesitated with something like this. But I don't see a valid case where the inet[6]dev must be created on a down interface. I think the patch is valid, even with your patch.
Your patch is more risky because it affects normal CHANGEMTU path, I am not sure if it is correct to not to add idev when it is down either. This is a very unusual path, we don't have to take the risk.