[PATCH v3 net-next 06/12] selftests/bpf: change test_verifier expectations
From: Edward Cree via iovisor-dev <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-27 12:59:19
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
bpf [general] (safe dynamic programs and tools), bpf [selftests] (test runners & infrastructure), kernel selftest framework, the rest · Maintainers:
Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Shuah Khan, Linus Torvalds
Some of the verifier's error messages have changed, and some constructs that previously couldn't be verified are now accepted. Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree-s/n/eUQHGBpZroRs9YW3xA@public.gmane.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 226 ++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 116 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index fceed67..210a031 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 pointer arithmetic", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 subtraction from stack pointer", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .errstr = "R1 invalid mem access", .result = REJECT,
@@ -603,8 +603,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, -4), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "misaligned access", + .errstr = "misaligned stack access", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT, }, { "invalid map_fd for function call",
@@ -650,8 +651,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, - .errstr = "misaligned access", + .errstr = "misaligned value access", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT, }, { "sometimes access memory with incorrect alignment",
@@ -672,6 +674,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access", .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT, }, { "jump test 1",
@@ -1215,8 +1218,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) + 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "misaligned access", + .errstr = "misaligned context access", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT, }, { "check __sk_buff->hash, offset 0, half store not permitted",
@@ -1319,8 +1323,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) + 2), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "misaligned access", + .errstr = "misaligned context access", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT, }, { "check cb access: word, unaligned 2",
@@ -1330,8 +1335,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "misaligned access", + .errstr = "misaligned context access", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT, }, { "check cb access: word, unaligned 3",
@@ -1341,8 +1347,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 2), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "misaligned access", + .errstr = "misaligned context access", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT, }, { "check cb access: word, unaligned 4",
@@ -1352,8 +1359,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 3), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "misaligned access", + .errstr = "misaligned context access", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT, }, { "check cb access: double",
@@ -1379,8 +1387,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[1])), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "misaligned access", + .errstr = "misaligned context access", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT, }, { "check cb access: double, unaligned 2",
@@ -1390,8 +1399,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[3])), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "misaligned access", + .errstr = "misaligned context access", .result = REJECT, + .flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT, }, { "check cb access: double, oob 1",
@@ -1523,7 +1533,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "misaligned access off -6 size 8", + .errstr = "misaligned stack access off (0x0; 0x0)+-8+2 size 8", + .flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT, }, { "PTR_TO_STACK store/load - bad alignment on reg",
@@ -1535,7 +1546,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "misaligned access off -2 size 8", + .errstr = "misaligned stack access off (0x0; 0x0)+-10+8 size 8", + .flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT, }, { "PTR_TO_STACK store/load - out of bounds low",
@@ -1579,8 +1591,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, - .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 pointer arithmetic", }, { "unpriv: add pointer to pointer",
@@ -1591,7 +1601,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = ACCEPT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 pointer arithmetic", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 pointer += pointer", }, { "unpriv: neg pointer",
@@ -1932,10 +1942,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, -8), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "pointer arithmetic prohibited", - .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .errstr = "R1 invalid mem access", - .result = REJECT, + .result = ACCEPT, }, { "unpriv: cmp of stack pointer",
@@ -1999,7 +2006,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "invalid stack type R3", + .errstr = "R4 min value is negative", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, {
@@ -2016,7 +2023,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "invalid stack type R3", + .errstr = "R4 min value is negative", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, {
@@ -2218,7 +2225,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "invalid stack type R3 off=-1 access_size=-1", + .errstr = "R4 min value is negative", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, {
@@ -2235,7 +2242,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "invalid stack type R3 off=-1 access_size=2147483647", + .errstr = "R4 unbounded memory access, use 'var &= const' or 'if (var < const)'", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, {
@@ -2252,7 +2259,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "invalid stack type R3 off=-512 access_size=2147483647", + .errstr = "R4 unbounded memory access, use 'var &= const' or 'if (var < const)'", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, {
@@ -2652,7 +2659,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1), BPF_JMP_A(-6), }, - .errstr = "misaligned packet access off 2+15+-4 size 4", + .errstr = "misaligned packet access off 2+(0x0; 0x0)+15+-4 size 4", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .flags = F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT,
@@ -2947,7 +2954,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, { - "helper access to packet: test14, cls helper fail sub", + "helper access to packet: test14, cls helper ok sub", .insns = { BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
@@ -2967,12 +2974,36 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + }, + { + "helper access to packet: test15, cls helper fail sub", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_6, 1), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 7), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_7, 6), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, 12), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 4), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_5, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_csum_diff), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "type=inv expected=fp", + .errstr = "invalid access to packet", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, { - "helper access to packet: test15, cls helper fail range 1", + "helper access to packet: test16, cls helper fail range 1", .insns = { BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
@@ -2997,7 +3028,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, { - "helper access to packet: test16, cls helper fail range 2", + "helper access to packet: test17, cls helper fail range 2", .insns = { BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
@@ -3018,11 +3049,11 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "invalid access to packet", + .errstr = "R2 min value is negative", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, { - "helper access to packet: test17, cls helper fail range 3", + "helper access to packet: test18, cls helper fail range 3", .insns = { BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
@@ -3043,11 +3074,11 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "invalid access to packet", + .errstr = "R2 min value is negative", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, { - "helper access to packet: test18, cls helper fail range zero", + "helper access to packet: test19, cls helper fail range zero", .insns = { BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
@@ -3072,7 +3103,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, { - "helper access to packet: test19, pkt end as input", + "helper access to packet: test20, pkt end as input", .insns = { BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
@@ -3097,7 +3128,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, { - "helper access to packet: test20, wrong reg", + "helper access to packet: test21, wrong reg", .insns = { BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
@@ -3157,7 +3188,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
@@ -3181,7 +3212,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
@@ -3209,7 +3240,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
@@ -3250,9 +3281,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", .errstr = "R0 min value is outside of the array range", - .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, },
@@ -3274,9 +3303,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", - .errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.", - .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .errstr = "R0 unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any array access into a map", .result = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, },
@@ -3290,7 +3317,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7), - BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, MAX_ENTRIES), BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 1), BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
@@ -3301,8 +3328,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", - .errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr", + .errstr = "R0 unbounded memory access", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
@@ -3328,7 +3355,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr", .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=44 size=8", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = REJECT,
@@ -3358,8 +3385,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3, 11 }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", - .errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer += pointer", + .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
@@ -3501,34 +3528,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS }, { - "multiple registers share map_lookup_elem bad reg type", - .insns = { - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 10), - BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_1, -8), - BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), - BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), - BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), - BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, - BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), - BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0), - BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0), - BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_0), - BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_0), - BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 1), - BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 2), - BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_3, 0, 1), - BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, 0, 0), - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 3), - BPF_EXIT_INSN(), - }, - .fixup_map1 = { 4 }, - .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "R3 invalid mem access 'inv'", - .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS - }, - { "invalid map access from else condition", .insns = { BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
@@ -3546,9 +3545,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr = "R0 unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any array access into a map", + .errstr = "R0 unbounded memory access", .result = REJECT, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, },
@@ -3860,7 +3859,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=0 size=-8", + .errstr = "R2 min value is negative", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, },
@@ -3972,7 +3971,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=4 size=-8", + .errstr = "R2 min value is negative", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, },
@@ -3994,7 +3993,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr = "R1 min value is outside of the array range", + .errstr = "R2 min value is negative", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, },
@@ -4110,7 +4109,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=4 size=-8", + .errstr = "R2 min value is negative", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, },
@@ -4133,7 +4132,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr = "R1 min value is outside of the array range", + .errstr = "R2 min value is negative", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, },
@@ -4221,13 +4220,13 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3), - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr = "R1 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check", + .errstr = "R1 unbounded memory access", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, },
@@ -4347,7 +4346,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr", .result = ACCEPT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
@@ -4375,7 +4374,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr", .result = ACCEPT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
@@ -4394,7 +4393,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 bitwise operator &= on pointer", .errstr = "invalid mem access 'inv'", .result = REJECT, .result_unpriv = REJECT,
@@ -4413,7 +4412,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 32-bit pointer arithmetic prohibited", .errstr = "invalid mem access 'inv'", .result = REJECT, .result_unpriv = REJECT,
@@ -4432,7 +4431,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic with /= operator", .errstr = "invalid mem access 'inv'", .result = REJECT, .result_unpriv = REJECT,
@@ -4475,10 +4474,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", .result = REJECT, - .result_unpriv = REJECT, }, { "map element value is preserved across register spilling",
@@ -4500,7 +4497,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr", .result = ACCEPT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
@@ -4682,7 +4679,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "R2 unbounded memory access", + /* because max wasn't checked, signed min is negative */ + .errstr = "R2 min value is negative, either use unsigned or 'var &= const'", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, },
@@ -4738,7 +4736,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, sizeof(struct test_val), 4), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
@@ -4764,7 +4762,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, sizeof(struct test_val) + 1, 4), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
@@ -4792,7 +4790,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, sizeof(struct test_val) - 20, 4), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
@@ -4819,7 +4817,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, sizeof(struct test_val) - 19, 4), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
@@ -4831,6 +4829,20 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, }, { + "helper access to variable memory: size = 0 allowed on NULL", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_5, 0), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_csum_diff), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + }, + { "helper access to variable memory: size > 0 not allowed on NULL", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
@@ -4844,7 +4856,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_csum_diff), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "R1 type=imm expected=fp", + .errstr = "R1 type=inv expected=fp", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, },
@@ -4929,7 +4941,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 4), - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 6), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, -4), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_1, 2), BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
@@ -4938,10 +4950,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", - .errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.", + .errstr = "R0 max value is outside of the array range", .result = REJECT, - .result_unpriv = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, {
@@ -4970,10 +4980,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", - .errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.", + .errstr = "R0 max value is outside of the array range", .result = REJECT, - .result_unpriv = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, {
@@ -5020,7 +5028,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .fixup_map_in_map = { 3 }, .errstr = "R1 type=inv expected=map_ptr", - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 pointer arithmetic on CONST_PTR_TO_MAP prohibited", .result = REJECT, }, {
@@ -5300,10 +5308,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", .errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.", .result = REJECT, - .result_unpriv = REJECT, }, };