Re: [UBSAN] iwlmvm's iwl_mvm_enable_txq accesses IEEE80211_INVAL_HW_QUEUE
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date: 2017-06-23 07:59:04
Also in:
linux-wireless, lkml
On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 09:48 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
mac80211_queue is 255 which is IEEE80211_INVAL_HW_QUEUE, so it should not be worked with at all.
Funny you should find this today :-)
The invalid queue is hopefully handled in ieee80211_check_queues after drv_add_interface in ieee80211_do_open: res = drv_add_interface(local, sdata); if (res) goto err_stop; res = ieee80211_check_queues(sdata, ieee80211_vif_type_p2p(&sdata->vif)); But the mvm driver still should not blindly shift 1 by 255 in iwl_mvm_enable_txq. Should the check for the invalid queue be before adding the interface in mac80211? Or should drivers check it in their add_interface?
Everything is actually handled well afaict, because the bug won't matter - this is a queue we'll never really stop, so we won't be looking at the (invalid) result of the calculation. I had actually been under the impression that it wasn't undefined but would just result in 0; that's clearly not true but also doesn't matter. AFAICT it even results in 0x80000000 (which makes some sense, since 255 % 32 == 31), and that's a queue number (31) that's too big for mac80211 anyway, so it would warn if we were to ever try to stop it. In later versions of the code, however, there *was* indeed a bug - we were using a u8 instead of a u32 in the code we have internally. While fixing *that* bug, I also made this catch the case of IEEE80211_INVAL_HW_QUEUE so we'll not modify the bitmap at all, which is the correct thing to do. IOW - yes, it's not nice, but it also shouldn't matter, and even if for some strange reason we tried to stop the queue we'd just get a warning from mac80211. johannes