Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2017-06-12

Re: [RFC V1 1/1] net: cdc_ncm: Reduce memory use when kernel memory low

From: Baxter, Jim <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-12 12:32:35
Also in: lkml

From: Oliver Neukum (oneukum@suse.com) Sent: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 12:24:07 +0200
Am Dienstag, den 23.05.2017, 20:06 +0100 schrieb Jim Baxter:
quoted
From: David S. Miller (davem@davemloft.net)
Sent: Tue, 23 May 2017 11:26:25 -0400 
quoted
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 10:42:48 +0200
quoted

We could use a counter. After the first failure, do it once, after the
second twice and so on. And reset the counter as a higher order
allocation works. (just bound it somewhere)
So an exponential backoff, that might work.
As an idea I have created this patch as an addition to the original patch
in this series.

Would this be acceptable?

At the moment I have capped the value at 10, does anyone think it needs to
be much higher then that?
Hi,

I am working through mail backlog. If I may ask, has this patch proposal
had a result or does something need to be done still?

	Regards
		Oliver
Hi,

I have not received any response to my additional patch yet.

Do you think I should submit it as a second RFC patchset?

Regards,
Jim
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help