On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 06:31:01AM +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
quoted
Hi,
Hi,
quoted
True, OTOH we need tid to be 8 sometimes. We *just* need to make sure
that we don't index tid_data with this. Hence I think the proper fix is:
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c
index 06ac3f1..16a8646 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c
@@ -1190,11 +1190,11 @@ void iwlagn_rx_reply_tx(struct iwl_priv *priv,
struct iwl_rx_cmd_buffer *rxb)
quoted
next_reclaimed;
IWL_DEBUG_TX_REPLY(priv, "Next reclaimed packet:%d\n",
next_reclaimed);
+ iwlagn_check_ratid_empty(priv, sta_id, tid);
}
iwl_trans_reclaim(priv->trans, txq_id, ssn, &skbs);
- iwlagn_check_ratid_empty(priv, sta_id, tid);
freed = 0;
/* process frames */
I can confirm it works. You can add my Tested-By.
Patch in review in our internal tree. It'll be upstreamed through the regular process.
Thanks for your report and debug work.