Re: [Patch net] igmp: acquire pmc lock for ip_mc_clear_src()
flat view
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Date: 2017-06-12 18:30:19
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Cong Wang [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Andrey reported a use-after-free in add_grec(): for (psf = *psf_list; psf; psf = psf_next) { ... psf_next = psf->sf_next; where the struct ip_sf_list's were already freed by: kfree+0xe8/0x2b0 mm/slub.c:3882 ip_mc_clear_src+0x69/0x1c0 net/ipv4/igmp.c:2078 ip_mc_dec_group+0x19a/0x470 net/ipv4/igmp.c:1618 ip_mc_drop_socket+0x145/0x230 net/ipv4/igmp.c:2609 inet_release+0x4e/0x1c0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:411 sock_release+0x8d/0x1e0 net/socket.c:597 sock_close+0x16/0x20 net/socket.c:1072 This happens because we don't hold pmc->lock in ip_mc_clear_src() and a parallel mr_ifc_timer timer could jump in and access them. The RCU lock is there but it is merely for pmc itself, this spinlock could actually ensure we don't access them in parallel. Thanks to Eric and Long for discussion on this bug. Reported-by: Andrey Konovalov <redacted> Cc: Eric Dumazet <redacted> Cc: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <redacted> --- net/ipv4/igmp.c | 21 +++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/net/ipv4/igmp.c b/net/ipv4/igmp.c index 44fd86d..8f6b5bb 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/igmp.c +++ b/net/ipv4/igmp.c@@ -2071,21 +2071,26 @@ static int ip_mc_add_src(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 *pmca, int sfmode, static void ip_mc_clear_src(struct ip_mc_list *pmc) { - struct ip_sf_list *psf, *nextpsf; + struct ip_sf_list *psf, *nextpsf, *tomb, *sources; - for (psf = pmc->tomb; psf; psf = nextpsf) { + spin_lock_bh(&pmc->lock); + tomb = pmc->tomb; + pmc->tomb = NULL; + sources = pmc->sources; + pmc->sources = NULL; + pmc->sfmode = MCAST_EXCLUDE; + pmc->sfcount[MCAST_INCLUDE] = 0; + pmc->sfcount[MCAST_EXCLUDE] = 1; + spin_unlock_bh(&pmc->lock); + + for (psf = tomb; psf; psf = nextpsf) { nextpsf = psf->sf_next; kfree(psf); } - pmc->tomb = NULL; - for (psf = pmc->sources; psf; psf = nextpsf) { + for (psf = sources; psf; psf = nextpsf) { nextpsf = psf->sf_next; kfree(psf); }
Hi, Cong.
how about in ip_check_mc_rcu():
for (psf = im->sources; psf; psf = psf->sf_next) {
if (psf->sf_inaddr == src_addr)
break;
}
I didn't see spinlock for it, is it safe to access them in parallel ?
or these two places would never be in parallel ?
I've already checked elsewhere, all other places where it accesses
or traverses im->sources are protected by this spinlock.
- pmc->sources = NULL; - pmc->sfmode = MCAST_EXCLUDE; - pmc->sfcount[MCAST_INCLUDE] = 0; - pmc->sfcount[MCAST_EXCLUDE] = 1; } /* Join a multicast group -- 2.5.5