Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 4 authors, 2017-06-13

Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 4/4] net/mlx5: Add CONFIG_MLX5_ESWITCH Kconfig

flat view

From: Or Gerlitz <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-08 09:35:22

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:42 AM, Saeed Mahameed [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
@@ -2961,9 +2961,8 @@ static int mlx5e_modify_channels_vsd(struct mlx5e_channels *chs, bool vsd)
        return 0;
 }

-static int mlx5e_setup_tc(struct net_device *netdev, u8 tc)
+static int mlx5e_setup_tc(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, u8 tc)
 {
-       struct mlx5e_priv *priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
        struct mlx5e_channels new_channels = {};
        int err = 0;
@@ -2995,6 +2994,7 @@ static int mlx5e_ndo_setup_tc(struct net_device *dev, u32 handle,
 {
        struct mlx5e_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);

+#ifdef CONFIG_MLX5_ESWITCH
        if (TC_H_MAJ(handle) != TC_H_MAJ(TC_H_INGRESS))
                goto mqprio;
@@ -3013,12 +3013,13 @@ static int mlx5e_ndo_setup_tc(struct net_device *dev, u32 handle,
        }

 mqprio:
+#endif
        if (tc->type != TC_SETUP_MQPRIO)
-               return -EINVAL;
+               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
why change this corner in this patch? we're doing enough changes
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk

        tc->mqprio->hw = TC_MQPRIO_HW_OFFLOAD_TCS;

-       return mlx5e_setup_tc(dev, tc->mqprio->num_tc);
+       return mlx5e_setup_tc(priv, tc->mqprio->num_tc);
 }
same comment
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -948,13 +946,11 @@ static int mlx5_init_once(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, struct mlx5_priv *priv)
                goto err_rl_cleanup;
        }

-#ifdef CONFIG_MLX5_CORE_EN
        err = mlx5_eswitch_init(dev);
        if (err) {
                dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to init eswitch %d\n", err);
                goto err_mpfs_cleanup;
        }
-#endif
why? before this patch we were doing it only if Ethernet
(MLX5_CORE_EN) was defined into the build,
and now we are returning blindly zero if another config isn't there
(CONFIG_MLX5_ESWITCH) - is that
fully equivalent? do we want to be fully equiv?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -965,10 +961,8 @@ static int mlx5_init_once(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, struct mlx5_priv *priv)
        return 0;

 err_eswitch_cleanup:
-#ifdef CONFIG_MLX5_CORE_EN
        mlx5_eswitch_cleanup(dev->priv.eswitch);
 err_mpfs_cleanup:
-#endif
same comment/question
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help