Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 5 authors, 2017-06-07

Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] udp: avoid a cache miss on dequeue

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: 2017-06-01 16:40:57

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Paolo Abeni [off-list ref] wrote:
I'm sorry, I do not follow. I'm concerned about the secpath field (skb-
quoted
sp), which is the only one that can be not NULL in
__udp_queue_rcv_skb().

If the secpath is not NULL, calling there secpath_reset() (or the to-
be-introduced skb_reset_head_state()), we will properly release it and
we will clear the field, too.

Calling skb_release_head_state() in the same scenario, we release the
secpath, but we don't clear it. So if the packet is later dropped we
will get a double free, unless we add and use a specialized a
free_stateless_skb(), too.
Then simply use secpath_reset() instead of secpath_put() from
skb_release_head_state()

Clearly having these subtle differences bring confusion, for very little gain.

secpath_put() should be removed. Most of its callers simply set
skb->sp back to NULL anyway.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help