Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] udp: avoid a cache miss on dequeue
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: 2017-06-01 16:40:57
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: 2017-06-01 16:40:57
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Paolo Abeni [off-list ref] wrote:
I'm sorry, I do not follow. I'm concerned about the secpath field (skb-quoted
sp), which is the only one that can be not NULL in__udp_queue_rcv_skb(). If the secpath is not NULL, calling there secpath_reset() (or the to- be-introduced skb_reset_head_state()), we will properly release it and we will clear the field, too. Calling skb_release_head_state() in the same scenario, we release the secpath, but we don't clear it. So if the packet is later dropped we will get a double free, unless we add and use a specialized a free_stateless_skb(), too.
Then simply use secpath_reset() instead of secpath_put() from skb_release_head_state() Clearly having these subtle differences bring confusion, for very little gain. secpath_put() should be removed. Most of its callers simply set skb->sp back to NULL anyway.