Thanks David.

Hi all,

I have two questions about the code at arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c.

1. At line 708, " const u8 r1 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_1]; /* r1: struct
sk_buff *skb */ ".
    Why is this code using BPF_REG_1 before saving it? As far as I
know, BPF_REG_1 has pointer to bpf program context and this code
clearly is overwriting that pointer which makes that pointer useless
for future usage. It clearly looks like a bug.

2. At line 256, " emit(A64_LDR64(prg, tmp, r3), ctx); ".
    This line of code is used to load an array( of pointers ) element,
where r3 is used as an index of that array. Shouldn't it be be
arithmetic left shifted by 3 or multiplied by 8 to get the right
address in that array of pointers ?

Apologies if any of the above question is stupid to ask.

Best,
Shubham
Best,
Shubham Bansal


On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 12:08 AM, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:

From: Shubham Bansal <redacted>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 22:18:16 +0530

quoted

Hi Daniel,

Thanks for the last reply about the testing of eBPF JIT.

I have one issue though, I am not able to find what BPF_ABS and
BPF_IND instruction does exactly.

They are not instructions, they are modifiers for the BPF_LD
instruction which indicate an SKB load is to be performed.

You never need to ask what a BPF instruction does, it is clear
defined in the BPF interperter found in kernel/bpf/core.c

Look for the case statement LD_ABS_W and friends in __bpf_prog_run().