On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 01:58:05PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:

Hi Greg,

Am 10.05.2017 um 10:53 schrieb Stefan Wahren:

quoted

Instead of returning the requested baudrate, we better return the
actual one because it isn't always the same.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <redacted>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <redacted>
---
 drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c b/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c
index 487c88f..2cfdf34 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c

@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static unsigned int ttyport_set_baudrate(struct serdev_controller *ctrl, unsigne
 
 	/* tty_set_termios() return not checked as it is always 0 */
 	tty_set_termios(tty, &ktermios);
-	return speed;
+	return ktermios.c_ospeed;
 }
 
 static void ttyport_set_flow_control(struct serdev_controller *ctrl, bool enable)

there is no dependency to this series. I would be happy if this could be
applied, so i don't have to carry it for the next version.

Ok, I'll take it now.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html