From: Vivien Didelot <redacted>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 11:51:05 -0400

Hi David,

Vivien Didelot [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Vivien Didelot (18):
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add max VID to info
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: split VTU entry data member
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: move VTU Operation accessors
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: move VTU flush
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: move VTU FID accessors
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: move VTU SID accessors
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: move VTU VID accessors
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: move generic VTU GetNext
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: move VTU Data accessors
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: move STU GetNext operation
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: get STU entry on VTU GetNext
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: load STU entry with VTU entry
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add VTU GetNext operation
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add VTU Load/Purge operation
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: make VTU helpers static
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: simplify VTU entry getter
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: support the VTU Page bit
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add VTU support for 88E6390

 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/Makefile      |   1 +
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c        | 568 +++++++++-----------------------
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1.h     |  14 +
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_vtu.c | 505 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/mv88e6xxx.h   |  31 +-
 5 files changed, 684 insertions(+), 435 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_vtu.c

I don't see the patchset in net-next. Can you pick it?

This had feedback which you must address, therefore the state in
patchwork is "changes requested" which you could have checked before
asking me this.

If the patch set is fine and you got ACKs for all of your patches
then please resubmit.

Otherwise, make the changes you were asked to make or explain to
the person who asked for them why they are not appropriate.