Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility

On 04/20/2017 10:36 PM, David Miller wrote:

From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:14:37 +0100

quoted

I agree, except I don't think you're going far enough. Those "standard
names" you mention... some of this stuff actually depends on __GLIBC__,
and *that* isn't right either.

Yep, that's something that needs correcting.

Should all libc implementations define __GLIBC__ or could we at least
switch the kernel UAPI to !__KERNEL__ here?

Hauke