Thread (36 messages) 36 messages, 8 authors, 2017-06-04

Re: [PATCH 06/12] audit: Use timespec64 to represent audit timestamps

From: Arnd Bergmann <hidden>
Date: 2017-04-15 10:29:00
Also in: ceph-devel, linux-btrfs, linux-cifs, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-security-module, lkml

On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Deepa Dinamani [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I have no problem merging this patch into audit/next for v4.12, would
you prefer me to do that so at least this patch is merged?
This would be fine.
But, I think whoever takes the last 2 deletion patches should also take them.
I'm not sure how that part works out.
quoted
It would probably make life a small bit easier for us in the audit
world too as it would reduce the potential merge conflict.  However,
that's a relatively small thing to worry about.
As Andrew has picked the remaining patches up into -mm, this will work
out fine: any patches picked up by the respective maintainers for v4.12
should arrive as git pull requests before the -mm patches get applied
at a later stage of the merge window.

     Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help