On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 14:37 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:

From: Alexander Duyck <redacted>

quoted

From what I can tell there is only a couple spots where we are actually

checking the return value of sk_busy_loop. As there are only a few
consumers of that data, and the data being checked for can be replaced
with a check for !skb_queue_empty() we might as well just pull the code
out of sk_busy_loop and place it in the spots that actually need it.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <redacted>
---

Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <redacted>