Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/5] net-next: dsa: add dsa support for Mediatek MT7530 switch
From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
Date: 2017-03-23 08:07:06
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, lkml
Hi Andrew, The purpose for the regmap table registered is to provide a way which helps us to look up a specific register on the switch through regmap-debugfs. And not all ranges of register is defined so I only include the meaningful ones in a sparse way for the table. Sean On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 08:22 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
quoted
+static int +mt7623_trgmii_write(struct mt7530_priv *priv, u32 reg, u32 val) +{ + int ret; + + ret = regmap_write(priv->ethernet, TRGMII_BASE(reg), val); + if (ret < 0) + dev_err(priv->dev, + "failed to priv write register\n"); + return ret; +} + +static u32 +mt7623_trgmii_read(struct mt7530_priv *priv, u32 reg) +{ + int ret; + u32 val; + + ret = regmap_read(priv->ethernet, TRGMII_BASE(reg), &val); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(priv->dev, + "failed to priv read register\n"); + return ret; + } + + return val; +}Hi Sean These appear to be the only two accessors which use the regmap.quoted
+static int +mt7530_regmap_read(void *ctx, uint32_t reg, uint32_t *val) +{ + struct mt7530_priv *priv = (struct mt7530_priv *)ctx; + + /* BIT(15) is used as indication for pseudo registers + * which would be translated into the general MDIO + * access to leverage the unique regmap sys interface. + */ + if (reg & BIT(15)) + *val = mdiobus_read_nested(priv->bus, + (reg & 0xf00) >> 8, + (reg & 0xff) >> 2); + else + *val = mt7530_read(priv, reg); + + return 0; +}.....quoted
+static const struct regmap_range mt7530_readable_ranges[] = { + regmap_reg_range(0x0000, 0x00ac), /* Global control */ + regmap_reg_range(0x2000, 0x202c), /* Port Control - P0 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x2100, 0x212c), /* Port Control - P1 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x2200, 0x222c), /* Port Control - P2 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x2300, 0x232c), /* Port Control - P3 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x2400, 0x242c), /* Port Control - P4 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x2500, 0x252c), /* Port Control - P5 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x2600, 0x262c), /* Port Control - P6 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x30e0, 0x30f8), /* Port MAC - SYS */ + regmap_reg_range(0x3000, 0x3014), /* Port MAC - P0 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x3100, 0x3114), /* Port MAC - P1 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x3200, 0x3214), /* Port MAC - P2*/ + regmap_reg_range(0x3300, 0x3314), /* Port MAC - P3*/ + regmap_reg_range(0x3400, 0x3414), /* Port MAC - P4 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x3500, 0x3514), /* Port MAC - P5 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x3600, 0x3614), /* Port MAC - P6 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x4000, 0x40d4), /* MIB - P0 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x4100, 0x41d4), /* MIB - P1 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x4200, 0x42d4), /* MIB - P2 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x4300, 0x43d4), /* MIB - P3 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x4400, 0x44d4), /* MIB - P4 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x4500, 0x45d4), /* MIB - P5 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x4600, 0x46d4), /* MIB - P6 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x4fe0, 0x4ff4), /* SYS */ + regmap_reg_range(0x7000, 0x700c), /* SYS 2 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x7018, 0x7028), /* SYS 3 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x7800, 0x7830), /* SYS 4 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x7a00, 0x7a7c), /* TRGMII */ + regmap_reg_range(0x8000, 0x8078), /* Psedo address for Phy - P0 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x8100, 0x8178), /* Psedo address for Phy - P1 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x8200, 0x8278), /* Psedo address for Phy - P2 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x8300, 0x8378), /* Psedo address for Phy - P3 */ + regmap_reg_range(0x8400, 0x8478), /* Psedo address for Phy - P4 */ +};It looks like your regmap accessor are only used for 0x7a00 to 0x7a7c. It is not clear why you even bother with a regmap. If you have it, why not use it for all registers within the regmap? Andrew