Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg
From: Bjorn Andersson <hidden>
Date: 2017-03-22 21:57:46
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-bluetooth, linux-wireless, lkml
On Wed 22 Mar 11:44 PDT 2017, David Miller wrote:
From: Bjorn Andersson <redacted> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:35:42 -0700quoted
By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms. As the new (RPMSG-based) and old SMD implementations are mutually exclusive we have to change all client drivers in one commit, to make sure we have a working system before and after this transition. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <redacted> --- Based on v4.11-rc3 with Arnd's Kconfig dependency fixes for BT_QCOMSMD (https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/20/1038).Just some questions since I'm supposed to merge this into my net-next tree. What is the status of the Kconfig dependency fix and how will I be getting it?
There are two Kconfig dependencies in play here, the first is
c3104aae5d8c ("remoteproc: qcom: fix QCOM_SMD dependencies"), this was
picked up by Linus yesterday and will as such be in v4.10-rc4.
The other dependency, is the one Marcel wants you to pick up here is
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9635385/. It's on LKML, but if you
want I can resend it with you as direct recipient, with Marcel's ack.
Likely Arnd would like this fix to be sent upstream for v4.11 already.
Second, should I merge all three of these patches to net-next or just this one?
I would like all three to be merged in this cycle and in addition I have a couple of patches coming up that will cause some minor conflicts with patch 2 - so I would prefer if patch 2 was available in a tag I can merge into my tree. Would it be possible for you to prepare merge all 4 (these 3 and the bluetooth fix) and prepare a tag for Andy, Marcel and myself to include in our trees? Regards, Bjorn