On 2017年03月21日 18:25, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:

Hello!

On 3/21/2017 7:04 AM, Jason Wang wrote:

quoted

Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/ptr_ring.h | 65 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
index 6c70444..4771ded 100644
--- a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
+++ b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h

@@ -247,6 +247,22 @@ static inline void *__ptr_ring_consume(struct 

ptr_ring *r)
     return ptr;
 }

+static inline int __ptr_ring_consume_batched(struct ptr_ring *r,
+                         void **array, int n)
+{
+    void *ptr;
+    int i = 0;
+
+    while (i < n) {

   Hm, why not *for*?

Yes, it maybe better, if there's other comment on the series, will 
change it in next version.

Thanks

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization