Thread (20 messages) read the whole thread 20 messages, 2 authors, 2017-03-28

Re: [PATCH 0/5] net/packet: fix multiple overflow issues in ring buffers

From: Andrey Konovalov <hidden>
Date: 2017-03-28 15:16:00

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Willem de Bruijn
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Andrey Konovalov
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
This patchset addresses multiple overflows and signedness-related issues
in packet socket ring buffers.

Andrey Konovalov (5):
  net/packet: fix overflow in check for priv area size
  net/packet: add explicit checks for tp_frame_size
  net/packet: fix overflow in check for tp_frame_nr
  net/packet: fix overflow in check for tp_reserve
  net/packet: reorder checks for ring buffer parameters
These are a lot of changes to backport to stable kernels.

Can we separate the minimal patch set needed to address known overflow
to send to net (with annotation [PATCH net]) and follow up with the larger
cleanup to net-next.
Sure, I can put patches 2 and 5 to a separate patchset.
quoted
 net/packet/af_packet.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--
2.12.2.564.g063fe858b8-goog
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help