RE: [PATCH net-next 1/1] tcp: sysctl: Fix a race to avoid unexpected 0 window from space
From: Gao Feng <hidden>
Date: 2017-03-25 03:32:20
-----Original Message----- From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 4:32 AM To: gfree.wind@foxmail.com Cc: davem@davemloft.net; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Gao Feng [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] tcp: sysctl: Fix a race to avoid
unexpected 0
window from space On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:05:12 +0800 gfree.wind@foxmail.com wrote:quoted
From: Gao Feng <redacted> Because sysctl_tcp_adv_win_scale could be changed any time, so there is one race in tcp_win_from_space. For example, 1.sysctl_tcp_adv_win_scale<=0 (sysctl_tcp_adv_win_scale is negative now) 2.space>>(-sysctl_tcp_adv_win_scale) (sysctl_tcp_adv_win_scale is postive now) As a result, tcp_win_from_space returns 0. It is unexpected. Certainly if the compiler put the sysctl_tcp_adv_win_scale into one register firstly, then use the register directly, it would be ok. But we could not depend on the compiler behavior. Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <redacted> --- include/net/tcp.h | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h index6ec4ea6..119b592 100644--- a/include/net/tcp.h +++ b/include/net/tcp.h@@ -1252,9 +1252,11 @@ void tcp_select_initial_window(int __space,__u32 mss, __u32 *rcv_wnd, static inline int tcp_win_from_space(int space) { - return sysctl_tcp_adv_win_scale<=0 ? - (space>>(-sysctl_tcp_adv_win_scale)) : - space - (space>>sysctl_tcp_adv_win_scale); + int tcp_adv_win_scale = sysctl_tcp_adv_win_scale; + + return tcp_adv_win_scale <= 0 ? + (space>>(-tcp_adv_win_scale)) : + space - (space>>tcp_adv_win_scale); } /* Note: caller must be prepared to deal with negative returns */You need to use READ_ONCE() to be safe. The compiler is free to optimized
the
code back to the original unless READ_ONCE() is used.
Thanks your reminder. I could not figure out why compiler would do the optimization, rollback the global variable instead of local tmp variable. It breaks the original logic. BTW, I think the READ_ONCE is used to avoid reorder. Could you give some guides please ? Best Regards Feng