On Mon, 2017-03-20 at 01:24 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
Hash size can't negative so "unsigned int" is logically correct.
struct flow_cache_percpu *fcp = per_cpu_ptr(fc->percpu, cpu);
- size_t sz = sizeof(struct hlist_head) * flow_cache_hash_size(fc);
+ unsigned int sz = sizeof(struct hlist_head) * flow_cache_hash_size(fc);
if (!fcp->hash_table) {
fcp->hash_table = kzalloc_node(sz, GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
if (!fcp->hash_table) {
- pr_err("NET: failed to allocate flow cache sz %zu\n", sz);
+ pr_err("NET: failed to allocate flow cache sz %u\n", sz);
I do not see any improvement here.
What is wrong with size_t exactly ?