Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: ipv4: add support for ECMP hash policy choice
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <hidden>
Date: 2017-03-15 10:46:49
On Mar 15, 2017, at 11:17 AM, Nicolas Dichtel [off-list ref] wrote: Le 15/03/2017 à 00:45, David Ahern a écrit :quoted
On 3/14/17 5:27 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:quoted
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 15:38:40 -0700 Roopa Prabhu [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
That's what my initial version did, but this was discussed during NetConf in Seville and it was decided that it's best to make a global sysctl, thus the change.Correct, we discussed this, and we all agreed to only have a sysctl for now.Why? If you are going to have private discussions please post the rationale in public.Stephen, is there any reason to have a per ecmp route multipath algo selection ?. All platforms have a global multipath selection algo. I also don't see routing daemons ready or willing to specify a per ecmp route multipath selection algo attribute.There is no compelling reason to make the attribute per route. But the issue is more that configuration through sysctl's is problematic. It doesn't fit into the standard API paradigm. Sysctl's are like routing patches not part of the real CLI. Trying to trap sysctl's for things like switchedev offload is particularly problematic. I can see the case for either way, and don't have a fixed opinion.ok. understand the switchdev offload part. It was that way in the past...but today you can listen to sysctl updates on the netconf netlink channel. it works pretty well.Is there another patch to add the NETCONFA_ECMP support?does userspace care?Yes, I think it is needed so that userspace can correctly monitor this behavior. It also enables to check this parameter through netlink. Regards, Nicolas
This doesn’t fit the NETCONFA model well, there is no “all”, “default” or per iface option to be set, also the other multipath sysctl which affects behaviour doesn’t have a notification. Thanks, Nik