On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Willem de Bruijn
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
+static void virtnet_poll_cleantx(struct receive_queue *rq)
+{
+ struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
+ unsigned int index = vq2rxq(rq->vq);
+ struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[index];
+ struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, index);
+
+ __netif_tx_lock(txq, smp_processor_id());
+ free_old_xmit_skbs(sq, sq->napi.weight);
+ __netif_tx_unlock(txq);
Should we check tx napi weight here? Or this was treated as an independent
optimization?
Good point. This was not intended to run in no-napi mode as is.
With interrupts disabled most of the time in that mode, I don't
expect it to be worthwhile using in that case. I'll add the check
for sq->napi.weight != 0.
I'm wrong here. Rx interrupts are not disabled, of course. It is
probably worth benchmarking, then.