Re: [PATCH] uapi: fix linux/if_pppol2tp.h userspace compilation errors
From: Dmitry V. Levin <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-14 20:30:01
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 02:37:23PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <redacted> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:33:53 +0300quoted
In file included from /usr/include/linux/l2tp.h:12:0, from /usr/include/linux/if_pppol2tp.h:21, /usr/include/netinet/in.h:31:8: error: redefinition of 'struct in_addr'This is protected properly by __UAPI_DEF_IN_ADDR, so whichever gets included first makes the definition. This whole thing is designed so that if GLIBC headers are included first, __UAPI_DEF_IN_ADDR will be defined to zero, therefore linux/in.h won't try to make the definition. Otherwise it will. The facility should not be so fragile that we have to play all kinds of header ordering games. We would be imposing the same strange rules on userspace applications including these headers which is completely unacceptable.
The facility is so fragile that netinet/in.h cannot be included after
linux/in.h:
$ gcc -S -o/dev/null -xc /dev/null -include /usr/include/linux/in.h -include /usr/include/netinet/in.h
In file included from <command-line>:32:0:
/usr/include/netinet/in.h:31:8: error: redefinition of 'struct in_addr'
struct in_addr
^~~~~~~
In file included from <command-line>:32:0:
/usr/include/linux/in.h:84:8: note: originally defined here
struct in_addr {
^~~~~~~
So if the facility isn't working correctly, let's fix that instead of fidgeting with include ordering all over the tree.
I don't mind if the whole facility will get fixed someday. My humble objective was just to fix the regression introduced in v4.10-rc1 by commit 47c3e7783be4. -- ldv