Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 2 authors, 2017-02-15

Re: [PATCH] uapi: fix linux/if_pppol2tp.h userspace compilation errors

From: Dmitry V. Levin <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-14 20:30:01
Also in: lkml

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 02:37:23PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <redacted>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:33:53 +0300
quoted
In file included from /usr/include/linux/l2tp.h:12:0,
                 from /usr/include/linux/if_pppol2tp.h:21,
/usr/include/netinet/in.h:31:8: error: redefinition of 'struct in_addr'
This is protected properly by __UAPI_DEF_IN_ADDR, so whichever gets
included first makes the definition.

This whole thing is designed so that if GLIBC headers are included
first, __UAPI_DEF_IN_ADDR will be defined to zero, therefore
linux/in.h won't try to make the definition.  Otherwise it will.

The facility should not be so fragile that we have to play all
kinds of header ordering games.  We would be imposing the same
strange rules on userspace applications including these headers
which is completely unacceptable.
The facility is so fragile that netinet/in.h cannot be included after
linux/in.h:

$ gcc -S -o/dev/null -xc /dev/null -include /usr/include/linux/in.h -include /usr/include/netinet/in.h
In file included from <command-line>:32:0:
/usr/include/netinet/in.h:31:8: error: redefinition of 'struct in_addr'
 struct in_addr
        ^~~~~~~
In file included from <command-line>:32:0:
/usr/include/linux/in.h:84:8: note: originally defined here
 struct in_addr {
        ^~~~~~~
So if the facility isn't working correctly, let's fix that instead
of fidgeting with include ordering all over the tree.
I don't mind if the whole facility will get fixed someday.
My humble objective was just to fix the regression introduced in v4.10-rc1
by commit 47c3e7783be4.


-- 
ldv
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help