Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 5 authors, 2017-02-03

Re: net: suspicious RCU usage in nf_hook

From: Cong Wang <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-01 23:30:25
Also in: lkml, netfilter-devel

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 12:51 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 22:19 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
quoted
The context is process context (TX path before hitting qdisc), and
BH is not disabled, so in_interrupt() doesn't catch it. Hmm, this
makes me thinking maybe we really need to disable BH in this
case for nf_hook()? But it is called in RX path too, and BH is
already disabled there.
ipt_do_table() and similar netfilter entry points disable BH.

Maybe it is done too late.
I think we need a fix like the following one for minimum impact.
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 727b6fd..eee7d63 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1720,12 +1720,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(net_enable_timestamp);
 void net_disable_timestamp(void)
 {
 #ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
-       if (in_interrupt()) {
-               atomic_inc(&netstamp_needed_deferred);
-               return;
-       }
-#endif
+       atomic_inc(&netstamp_needed_deferred);
+#else
        static_key_slow_dec(&netstamp_needed);
+#endif
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(net_disable_timestamp);
This would permanently leave the kernel in the netstamp_needed state.

I would prefer the patch using a process context to perform the
cleanup ? Note there is a race window, but probably not a big deal.
Not sure if it is better. The difference is caught up in net_enable_timestamp(),
which is called setsockopt() path and sk_clone() path, so we could be
in netstamp_needed state for a long time too until user-space exercises
these paths.

I am feeling we probably need to get rid of netstamp_needed_deferred,
and simply defer the whole static_key_slow_dec(), like the attached patch
(compile only).

What do you think?

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help