Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 08/14] mlx4: use order-0 pages for RX

On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 09:23 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 11:58 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:

quoted

Use of order-3 pages is problematic in some cases.

This patch might add three kinds of regression :

1) a CPU performance regression, but we will add later page
recycling and performance should be back.

2) TCP receiver could grow its receive window slightly slower,
   because skb->len/skb->truesize ratio will decrease.
   This is mostly ok, we prefer being conservative to not risk OOM,
   and eventually tune TCP better in the future.
   This is consistent with other drivers using 2048 per ethernet frame.

3) Because we allocate one page per RX slot, we consume more
   memory for the ring buffers. XDP already had this constraint anyway.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---

Note that we also could use a different strategy.

Assume RX rings of 4096 entries/slots.

With this patch, mlx4 gets the strategy used by Alexander in Intel
drivers :

Each RX slot has an allocated page, and uses half of it, flipping to the
other half every time the slot is used.

So a ring buffer of 4096 slots allocates 4096 pages.

When we receive a packet train for the same flow, GRO builds an skb with
~45 page frags, all from different pages.

The put_page() done from skb_release_data() touches ~45 different struct
page cache lines, and show a high cost. (compared to the order-3 used
today by mlx4, this adds extra cache line misses and stalls for the
consumer)

If we instead try to use the two halves of one page on consecutive RX
slots, we might instead cook skb with the same number of MSS (45), but
half the number of cache lines for put_page(), so we should speed up the
consumer.

So there is a problem that is being overlooked here.  That is the cost
of the DMA map/unmap calls.  The problem is many PowerPC systems have
an IOMMU that you have to work around, and that IOMMU comes at a heavy
cost for every map/unmap call.  So unless you are saying you wan to
setup a hybrid between the mlx5 and this approach where we have a page
cache that these all fall back into you will take a heavy cost for
having to map and unmap pages.

The whole reason why I implemented the Intel page reuse approach the
way I did is to try and mitigate the IOMMU issue, it wasn't so much to
resolve allocator/freeing expense.  Basically the allocator scales,
the IOMMU does not.  So any solution would require making certain that
we can leave the pages pinned in the DMA to avoid having to take the
global locks involved in accessing the IOMMU.

I do not see any difference for the fact that we keep pages mapped the
same way.

mlx4_en_complete_rx_desc() will still use the :

dma_sync_single_range_for_cpu(priv->ddev, dma, frags->page_offset,
                              frag_size, priv->dma_dir);

for every single MSS we receive.

This wont change.