On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 20:02:35 -0800
Roopa Prabhu [off-list ref] wrote:
On 2/1/17, 5:59 PM, David Ahern wrote:
quoted
On 2/1/17 6:23 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:59:50PM -0800, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
quoted
This provides the required vxlan bridging function but poses a
scalability problem with using a separate vxlan netdev for each vni.
if I remember correctly this issue was the main reason David Ahern
put netdev on diet. Sounds like no more fun at netconf ;)
oh, it still needs a diet ...
Even if the netdev went on diet, a netdev per vni for vxlan deployments is just too much overhead.
But the intent was VNI == VLAN tag and there are cases where you need per VNI rules.
Having them all smashed into one netdev seems like a step in the wrong direction.