Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: bpf: remove redundant check for non-null image

[PATCH 1/3] powerpc: bpf: remove redundant check for non-null image · Naveen N. Rao <hidden> · 2017-01-13
[PATCH 2/3] powerpc: bpf: flush the entire JIT buffer · Naveen N. Rao <hidden> · 2017-01-13
Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc: bpf: flush the entire JIT buffer · Alexei Starovoitov <hidden> · 2017-01-13
Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc: bpf: flush the entire JIT buffer · Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> · 2017-01-13
Re: [2/3] powerpc: bpf: flush the entire JIT buffer · Michael Ellerman <hidden> · 2017-01-27
[PATCH 3/3] powerpc: bpf: implement in-register swap for 64-bit endian operations · Naveen N. Rao <hidden> · 2017-01-13
RE: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: bpf: implement in-register swap for 64-bit endian operations · David Laight <hidden> · 2017-01-13
Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: bpf: implement in-register swap for 64-bit endian operations · 'Naveen N. Rao' <hidden> · 2017-01-13
Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: bpf: implement in-register swap for 64-bit endian operations · Benjamin Herrenschmidt <hidden> · 2017-01-15
Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: bpf: implement in-register swap for 64-bit endian operations · 'Naveen N. Rao' <hidden> · 2017-01-23
RE: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: bpf: implement in-register swap for 64-bit endian operations · David Laight <hidden> · 2017-01-24
Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: bpf: implement in-register swap for 64-bit endian operations · 'Naveen N. Rao' <hidden> · 2017-01-24
Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: bpf: remove redundant check for non-null image · Alexei Starovoitov <hidden> · 2017-01-13
Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: bpf: remove redundant check for non-null image · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2017-01-16
Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: bpf: remove redundant check for non-null image · Naveen N. Rao <hidden> · 2017-01-23
Re: [1/3] powerpc: bpf: remove redundant check for non-null image · Michael Ellerman <hidden> · 2017-01-27

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2017-01-16 18:39:06
Also in: linuxppc-dev

I'm assuming these patches will go via the powerpc tree.

If you want them to go into net-next, I kindly ask that you always
explicitly say so, and furthermore always submit a patch series with
a proper "[PATCH 0/N] ..." header posting.

Thanks.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help